fix: Optimize script library scripts and execution methods#8262
fix: Optimize script library scripts and execution methods#8262f2c-ci-robot[bot] merged 1 commit intodev-v2from
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| done(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided JavaScript code for handling closing operations includes several changes and optimizations:
Changes Made
-
Querying Elements:
- Removed logging statements that query elements within
drawerContent.value. - Simplified the conditional logic to check for
.terminalexistence before asking for confirmation.
- Removed logging statements that query elements within
-
Handling Form Check:
- Combined
hasFormand!hasTerminalchecks into a single condition, simplifying the logic. - Returned early if no form or terminal is present, effectively skipping the modal prompt when unnecessary.
- Combined
-
Removed Unnecessary Code Block:
- The original block handling both forms and terminals was redundant with the current setup, which only handles non-terminal cases.
Optimization Suggestions/Improvements
-
Code Readability:
- Added comments to clarify the purpose of key lines and decisions made during the function execution.
- Maintaining consistent indentation throughout reduces cognitive load when reviewing the code.
-
Consistency with Logic:
- Ensured all conditions and actions are handled consistently across similar scenarios (i.e., checking for presence of
.el-formvs.terminal).
- Ensured all conditions and actions are handled consistently across similar scenarios (i.e., checking for presence of
These modifications make the code more efficient, easier to understand, and maintain while addressing potential edge cases where there might be empty drawers without either a form or a terminal element.
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code has two changes. The first change removes the runRef.value!.acceptParams call and instead replaces it with an ElMessageBox confirmation dialog prompting the user to confirm if they want to execute the script. This adds a layer of safety and prevents accidental execution of scripts without proper confirmation.
Potential Improvements:
- Consistent Usage: Ensure that all button configurations follow a consistent structure for better readability.
- Error Handling/Feedback: Consider adding handling for exceptions or errors during the execution step using something like try-catch blocks to improve robustness.
Here's the modified section of the code with improved formatting:
@@ -198,7 +198,32 @@ const buttons = [
{
label: i18n.global.t('commons.button.handle'),
click: (row: Cronjob.ScriptInfo) => {
- runRef.value!.acceptParams({ scriptID: row.id, scriptName: row.name });
+ ElMessageBox.confirm(
+ i18n.global.t('cronjob.library.handleHelper', [
+ globalStore.currentNode === 'local'
+ ? i18n.global.t('xpack.node.master')
+ : globalStore.currentNode,
+ row.name,
+ ]),
+ i18n.global.t('commons.button.handle'),
+ {
+ confirmButtonText: i18n.global.t('commons.button.confirm'),
+ cancelButtonText: i18n.global.t('commons.button.cancel'),
+ type: 'info',
+ },
+ )
+ .then(() => {
+ // Assuming runRef.value is defined elsewhere and acceptsParams method exists
+ try {
+ runRef.value.acceptParams({
+ scriptID: row.id,
+ scriptName: row.name,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Failed to execute script '${row.name}':`, error);
+ ElMessage.error(i18n.global.t('cronjob.errorMessage'));
+ }
+ })
+ .catch(() => {
+ // User canceled operation
+ ElMessage.info(i18n.global.t('cronjob.cancelledOperation'));
+ });
},
},
};This version includes basic exception handling and uses a more detailed message when the operation fails.
| _, _ = pty.Write([]byte("bash -c \"$INIT_SCRIPT\"\n")) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| lcmd := &LocalCommand{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The main issues with the code is:
- The comment in
initCmdshould be updated to mention that it's anINIT_SCRIPT. - There should be a space added after "bash" in
"bash -c "$INIT_SCRIPT\"", as per Unix shell syntax.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Use a function name like
CreateCommand. It better describes what the function does and aligns with Go naming conventions. - Consider using
filepath.Join()instead of manual concatenation when creating full paths if applicable, which would enhance safety and make the code more robust for different environments.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3 participants
No description provided.