fix: The newly created simple application dialogue process label is not effective#2485
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| max_length=256, | ||
| error_messages=ErrMessage.char(_("End of thinking process marker"))) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is an issue with the reasoning_content_start field: it now uses <think> by default instead of {"start": "<think>"}. This could lead to unexpected behavior if this value were required at runtime or if other parts of your application expect {"start": "<think>"} directly.
To resolve this, you should change the default value back to {"start": "<think>"}:
reasoning_content_start = serializers.CharField(required=False, allow_null=True,
default={"start": "<think>"},
allow_blank=True, max_length=256,
error_messages=ErrMessage.char(_("The thinking process begins to mark")))Also, ensure there are no similar issues with other fields that might have default values affecting expected data integrity.
1 participant
fix: The newly created simple application dialogue process label is not effective