perf: Prompt word alignment issue(#2537)

[wangdan-fit2cloud]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The code looks mostly clean and well-structured. Here are some minor observations:

1. The indentation style could be consistent with other parts of the file.

2. The variable names {data} and {question} are reused in both places within each object. If these variables should refer to different data sources, this should be clarified.

3. There seems to be duplication between "by adjusting" or "- please use concise and professional language" and similar phrases elsewhere in the comments.

4. Some line breaks could be adjusted for better readability.

Overall, the function seems to achieve its intended purpose effectively, but these are just points that might want further attention based on how it will be used and maintained long-term.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code looks mostly clean. However, here's a suggestion for improvement:

- **Suggestion:** Consider adding `v-slot` with dynamic arguments instead of using `<slot>` directly if you expect multiple slots to be used in different places within the same component.

For example, if you have multiple custom slots that need distinct behaviors based on their names (e.g., `"header"`, `"content"`), you can use `v-slot:[name]`.

Example usage:
```html
<template>
  <div>
    <!-- Dynamic slot -->
    <component :is="'custom-slot-' + name"></component>

    <!-- Regular slots -->
    <slot></slot> <!-- Fallback/default slot -->

    <!-- Specific named slots -->
    <slot name="title">Default title</slot>
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
import CustomSlotTitle from './CustomSlotTitle.vue'
import CustomSlotContent from './CustomSlotContent.vue'

defineProps({
  // props...
})

const componentName = () => {
  const { name } = getCurrentInstance().type;
  return name.startsWith('CustomSlot') ? name.replace(/^CustomSlot/i, '') : '';
};
</script>

This approach provides more flexibility and clarity about how your slots should behave across different templates. If you have a specific implementation in mind when dealing with custom slots, let me know!