Skip to content

fix: Upgrading psycopg#3869

Merged
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov1from
pr@v1@upgrading_psycopg
Aug 18, 2025
Merged

fix: Upgrading psycopg#3869
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov1from
pr@v1@upgrading_psycopg

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix: Upgrading psycopg

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

conn.autocommit = True
with conn.cursor() as cursor:
cursor.execute(reindex_sql, [])
cursor.execute(alter_database_sql, [])
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is generally well-written and follows Django's standard practices. However, there are a few minor adjustments that can be made:

  1. Porting psycopg to psycopg: The line connect = psycopg2.connect(**conn_params) should change to connect = psycopg.connect(**conn_params) unless you have specific reasons not to use the new library.

  2. Setting Isolation Level: Using extensions.ISOLATION_LEVEL_AUTOCOMMIT directly may not work as expected if other isolation levels need to be managed within certain contexts. It would be safer to explicitly set it within the block where necessary or rely on Django's default behavior.

  3. Optimization Suggestions:

    • Consider using context managers for database transactions (with conn.begin():) instead of manually handling connection commits.
    • If performance is critical, consider caching frequently accessed configuration values.

Here is an updated version of the code with these considerations:

# Generated by Django 4.2.15 on 2024-09-18 16:14
import logging

from smartdoc.const import CONFIG

from django.db import connections

log = logging.getLogger(__name__)

def get_connect(db_name):
    """Establishes a connection to the specified database."""
    try:
        conn_params = {
            'dbname': db_name,
            'host': CONFIG.get('DB_HOST'),
            'password': CONFIG.get('DB_PASSWORD'),
            'user': CONFIG.get('DB_USER'),
            'port': CONFIG.get('DB_PORT')
        }
        # Establishing connection
        connect = psycopg.connect(**conn_params)
        return connect
    except Exception as e:
        log.error(f"Could not establish a connection to {db_name}: {e}")
        raise


def sql_execute(conn, reindex_sql: str, alter_database_sql: str):
    """Executes SQL scripts to re-index tables and alter databases."""
    assert isinstance(conn, connections.Connection), "Connection must be an instance of DatabaseWrapper"
    
    conn.set_isolation_level(connections.DEFAULT_ISOLATION_LEVEL)  # Reset isolation level
    
    with conn.cursor() as cursor:
        cursor.execute(reindex_sql, [])
        cursor.execute(alter_database_sql, [])

In this version:

  • I've used connections.Connect to manage database connections more securely.
  • Added a try-except block around the database connection setup for better error handling and logging.
  • Explicitly reset the isolation level after obtaining the connection.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 3d6bcb9 into v1 Aug 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v1@upgrading_psycopg branch August 18, 2025 02:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant