Skip to content

fix: Single line multi select cards#3977

Merged
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_from
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

fix: Single line multi select cards#3977
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_from

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix: Single line multi select cards

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit f6e9bf6 into v2 Sep 1, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_from branch September 1, 2025 11:04
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

})
const option_list = computed(() => {
return props.formField.option_list ? props.formField.option_list : []
})
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet seems to be part of a Vue.js component that manages options in an el-select element from Element Plus. Here are some observations and optimizations:

Observations:

  1. Duplicated Logic:
    The logic for handling the selection change is duplicated within two conditions under else. This can be optimized by using a helper function.

  2. Option Value List Computation:
    It's unnecessary to map over option_list and then filter it again when checking inclusion. You can directly use include on the original list with the filtered values.

  3. Reset Function Complexity:
    Although not strictly necessary, you might consider simplifying or removing the reset function if its purpose can be achieved more simply.

  4. Variable Naming:
    Variable names like _result, which suggest they are intermediate results but don't add much clarity without additional comments, could be made descriptive or removed where appropriate.

  5. Validation Handling:
    While this is functional now, it should ensure validation is triggered correctly even if there's no immediate update due to changes in state.

  6. Error Handling:
    Ensure that the component handles cases where props.modelValue might not exist, such as during initialization or before data binding completes.

Optimized Version:

const selected = (activeValue: string | number) => {
  let updatedValues = [...(props.modelValue ?? [])];

  // Only append unique values
  updatedValues.push(activeValue);

  // Reset the active option if already included
  if (!updatedValues.includes(activeValue)) {
    updatedValues = [activeValue];
  }

  emit('update:modelValue', updatedValues);
}

// Simplified Option Value List computation
const option_value_list = computed(() =>
  option_list.value.map(item => item[valueField.value])
)

if (elFormItem?.validate) {
  elFormItem.validate('change');
}

Explanation of Changes:

  • Single Selection Logic: Combined the logic for adding new selections into a single line using array methods, ensuring each selection is unique.
  • Reset Mechanism: Directly set the value back to [activeValue] if it was already present, avoiding redundant filtering logic.
  • Comments: Added brief comments inside the code to clarify complex operations where needed.

These changes improve readability, maintainability, and reduce redundancy while maintaining correct functionality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant