Skip to content

fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back#3978

Merged
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_form_node
Sep 2, 2025
Merged

fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back#3978
shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_form_node

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit c4c0ba0 into v2 Sep 2, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_form_node branch September 2, 2025 03:18
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

const reset = (activeValue: string | number) => {
const _result = props.modelValue ? [...props.modelValue, activeValue] : [activeValue]
return _result.filter((r) => option_value_list.value.includes(r))
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is clean and does not have any serious errors or issues based on the given context. However, there are minor optimizations you can make:

  1. Type Safety: In TypeScript, it's better to explicitly specify the type of arrays when pushing items using push(). You can avoid the need for a temporary array _result by pushing directly into props.modelValue.

  2. Filtering Optimization: If option_value_list.value.includes(r) always returns true (or false), the filtering step might be unnecessary unless the list contains multiple values.

Here's the optimized version of the code:

const selected = (activeValue: string | number) => {
  elFormItem.validate('change');
}

const reset = (activeValue: string | number) => {
  if (!props.modelValue || !Array.isArray(props.modelValue)) {
    props.modelValue = [];
  }
  
  // Push activeValue onto the existing array or create a new one with activeValue only
  const _selectedValues = props.modelValue.push(activeValue) > -1 
    ? props.modelValue.slice(0)
    : [activeValue];

  
  // This line was potentially inefficient due to slicing. It could be replaced by the above logic.
  /* const _filteredSelectedValues = _selectedValues.filter((r) =>
    option_value_list.value.includes(r)); */

  return _selectedValues;
}

These changes ensure that the code remains efficient while adhering to TypeScript best practices.

if (!props.modelValue) {
emit('update:modelValue', [])
}
return props.modelValue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The given code snippet contains the following issues and potential improvements:

  1. Logical Error: The model_value function is incorrectly trying to access its own property within itself (model_value.value). This will cause an error because a computed property cannot directly access other properties.

  2. Typo: In the line emit("update:modelValue", []), there seems to be an unnecessary colon after "update:modelValue".

Corrections

Here’s the corrected version of the code with improved logic:

const model_value = computed(() => {
  return props.modelValue;
});

By removing model_value.value, you prevent direct interaction that leads to errors, improving maintainability and security. Additionally, the typo has been fixed.

This change ensures that the computed getter does not inadvertently interact with its own state.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant