fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back#3978
fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back#3978shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intov2from
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| const reset = (activeValue: string | number) => { | ||
| const _result = props.modelValue ? [...props.modelValue, activeValue] : [activeValue] | ||
| return _result.filter((r) => option_value_list.value.includes(r)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code is clean and does not have any serious errors or issues based on the given context. However, there are minor optimizations you can make:
-
Type Safety: In TypeScript, it's better to explicitly specify the type of arrays when pushing items using
push(). You can avoid the need for a temporary array_resultby pushing directly intoprops.modelValue. -
Filtering Optimization: If
option_value_list.value.includes(r)always returns true (or false), the filtering step might be unnecessary unless the list contains multiple values.
Here's the optimized version of the code:
const selected = (activeValue: string | number) => {
elFormItem.validate('change');
}
const reset = (activeValue: string | number) => {
if (!props.modelValue || !Array.isArray(props.modelValue)) {
props.modelValue = [];
}
// Push activeValue onto the existing array or create a new one with activeValue only
const _selectedValues = props.modelValue.push(activeValue) > -1
? props.modelValue.slice(0)
: [activeValue];
// This line was potentially inefficient due to slicing. It could be replaced by the above logic.
/* const _filteredSelectedValues = _selectedValues.filter((r) =>
option_value_list.value.includes(r)); */
return _selectedValues;
}These changes ensure that the code remains efficient while adhering to TypeScript best practices.
| if (!props.modelValue) { | ||
| emit('update:modelValue', []) | ||
| } | ||
| return props.modelValue |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The given code snippet contains the following issues and potential improvements:
-
Logical Error: The
model_valuefunction is incorrectly trying to access its own property within itself (model_value.value). This will cause an error because a computed property cannot directly access other properties. -
Typo: In the line
emit("update:modelValue", []), there seems to be an unnecessary colon after"update:modelValue".
Corrections
Here’s the corrected version of the code with improved logic:
const model_value = computed(() => {
return props.modelValue;
});By removing model_value.value, you prevent direct interaction that leads to errors, improving maintainability and security. Additionally, the typo has been fixed.
This change ensures that the computed getter does not inadvertently interact with its own state.
fix: The execution details of the form file upload cannot be displayed back