Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
File renamed without changes.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
services:
emqx:
image: emqx/emqx:5.9.0
image: emqx/emqx:5.10.0
container_name: ${CONTAINER_NAME}
restart: always
networks:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet has a difference in the Docker image tag used. The original version uses emqx/emqx:5.9.0, while the updated version uses emqx/emqx:5.10.0. This change does not appear to be an error; instead, it indicates that you want to upgrade from EMQX Server version 5.9.0 to version 5.10.0.

For this specific update, there should be no irregularities or critical issues unless you have noticed something unusual about these versions compared to others in your environment. If you need further assistance or optimizations, please provide more details about your current setup and any existing configurations related to EMQX.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are the changes made:

  • emqx service is updated from image: emqx/emqx:5.9.0 to image: emqx/emqx:5.10.0, which indicates an upgrade from version 5.9.0 to 5.10.0.

There are no irregularities, potential issues, or obvious optimizations mentioned above. The change in image tag appears straightforward and reflects an update of a component in the system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes you provided seem to be correct with the exception of the version number which has been updated from 5.9.0 to 5.10.0. Here are some minor suggestions:

  • Ensure that ${CONTAINER_NAME} is properly defined and contains a value.
  • Review any specific configuration settings associated with EMQX in version 5.10.0, as this might introduce new options or required configurations.

Overall, the syntax looks clean and does not indicate any obvious issues. If all other necessary configurations remain consistent, these updates should suffice.

Expand Down