Skip to content

redistribute fields due to LUC over soil/snow layers#206

Draft
JhanSrbinovsky wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
LUC_reistribution-test
Draft

redistribute fields due to LUC over soil/snow layers#206
JhanSrbinovsky wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
LUC_reistribution-test

Conversation

@JhanSrbinovsky

@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

redistribute fields due to LUC over soil/snow layers


🚀 The latest prerelease access-esm1p6/pr206-9 at 7aedc7e is here: #206 (comment) 🚀

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-1 with commit ae6d721

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-2 with commit 73d2f72

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-3 with commit b2e62c1

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-4 with commit c2d1d94

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@JhanSrbinovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!redeploy

@JhanSrbinovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@Whyborn - this is giving me a strange permissions error and now seems to be stuck. first time Ive built with the library. Do you have any idea if hit is related?

@Whyborn

Whyborn commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, says Input/output error which indicates to me a filesystem error, I'm surprised that the !redeploy didn't trigger another build for you. I'll ask if there's a reason the !redeploy didn't work, and trigger another one myself (either with !redeploy or by force)

@Whyborn

Whyborn commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

!redeploy

@JhanSrbinovsky

JhanSrbinovsky commented Jul 17, 2026 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-7 with commit eb9ad65

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@Whyborn

Whyborn commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok, looks like you're back onto hitting actual code errors now (which are unrelated to the library)

@JhanSrbinovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

:) great !!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-8 with commit de8b64a

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ❌

@JhanSrbinovsky
JhanSrbinovsky deployed to Gadi Prerelease July 17, 2026 05:08 — with GitHub Actions Active
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr206-9 with commit 7aedc7e

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ✔️

Usage Instructions

access-esm1.6, defined in spack.yaml, will be deployed to Gadi as:

  • 2026.04.000 as a Release (when merged).
  • pr206-9 as a Prerelease (during this PR).

This Prerelease is accessible on Gadi using:

module use /g/data/vk83/prerelease/modules
module load access-esm1p6/pr206-9

When using the above modules, the binaries shall be on your $PATH.

For advanced users, this Prerelease is also accessible on Gadi via /g/data/vk83/prerelease/apps/spack/1.1/spack in the access-esm1p6-pr206-9 environment.
Due to inode-saving measures, one will have to manually untar the environment metadata before environment activation with tar -xf .spack-env .spack-env.tar. It will require one to have write privileges.

Configuration Information

This Prerelease is deployed using:

  • access-nri/spack on branch 1.1
  • ACCESS-NRI/upstream-spack-packages version access/v1.1
  • access-nri/access-spack-packages version 2026.02.002
  • access-nri/spack-config version 2026.05.004

If the above was not what was expected, commit changes to config/versions.json in this PR, or propose changes to build-cds config/settings.json.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants