fix: correct AmperePeakGflopsCalculation expected value

LessUp · devin-ai-integration[bot] · LessUp · commit f45adb0405d7 · 2026-07-01T19:05:55.000+08:00
The test expected 19481.0 GFLOPS but the correct calculation is 108 * 64 * 2 * 1.41 = 19491.84 GFLOPS. Fix the expected value and remove the stale * 1000 from the comment. Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai) Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
diff --git a/tests/test_device_info_cpu.cu b/tests/test_device_info_cpu.cu
@@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, VoltaPeakGflopsCalculation) {
 }
 
 TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, AmperePeakGflopsCalculation) {
-    // A100: 108 SMs * 64 cores/SM * 2 (FMA) * 1.41 GHz * 1000
-    // Expected: ~19.481 TFLOPS
+    // A100: 108 SMs * 64 cores/SM * 2 (FMA) * 1.41 GHz
+    // Expected: ~19.492 TFLOPS
     float peak_gflops = getTheoreticalPeakGflops(ampere_provider_);
-    EXPECT_NEAR(peak_gflops, 19481.0f, 0.1f);
+    EXPECT_NEAR(peak_gflops, 19491.84f, 0.1f);
 }
 
 TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, VoltaPeakBandwidthCalculation) {

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, VoltaPeakGflopsCalculation) {`
`106`	`106`	`}`
`107`	`107`
`108`	`108`	`TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, AmperePeakGflopsCalculation) {`
`109`		`- // A100: 108 SMs * 64 cores/SM * 2 (FMA) * 1.41 GHz * 1000`
`110`		`- // Expected: ~19.481 TFLOPS`
	`109`	`+ // A100: 108 SMs * 64 cores/SM * 2 (FMA) * 1.41 GHz`
	`110`	`+ // Expected: ~19.492 TFLOPS`
`111`	`111`	`float peak_gflops = getTheoreticalPeakGflops(ampere_provider_);`
`112`		`- EXPECT_NEAR(peak_gflops, 19481.0f, 0.1f);`
	`112`	`+ EXPECT_NEAR(peak_gflops, 19491.84f, 0.1f);`
`113`	`113`	`}`
`114`	`114`
`115`	`115`	`TEST_F(FakeDeviceProvider, VoltaPeakBandwidthCalculation) {`