Deprecate SpacecraftSystem BSK module#1002
Merged
Merged
Conversation
schaubh
force-pushed
the
feature/deprecate_SpacecraftSystem
branch
from
a688494 to
385c428
Compare
Mark2000
approved these changes
May 24, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The SpacecraftSystem dynamic object allowed multiple spacecraft objects to be perfectly rigidly connected. however, this concept was never fully completed. Plus, we have now more flexible manners to connect spacecraft objects using the constraint effector.
Verification
Ran all unit tests after doing the depreciation warning and the warnings showed up as expected. Next, updated the unit tests to silence the expected deprecation warnings. The warnings will show up when the 1 year grace period ends.
Documentation
Added release notes and documentation built without issues.
Future work
None