[#144] Fix an issue with RSO reward calculation

[Mark2000]

Description

Fixes and issue where the RSO reward bonus would be yielded and the episode would terminate if at least min_time_for_completion elapsed in the first step and no points were inspected during that step.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How should this pull request be reviewed?

• By commit
• All changes at once

How Has This Been Tested?

External testing.

Future Work

None.

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation and release notes
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Fixes a bug in RSO reward calculation where the bonus could be granted prematurely if no points were inspected, and improves debuggability by adding string representations and logging.

• Removed the skip guard for empty point_inspect_status to ensure correct reward logic.
• Added __repr__ methods to data classes for clearer debug output.
• Inserted a logging statement to report inspected/illuminated/total counts.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
src/bsk_rl/data/rso_inspection.py	Removed empty-data skip in calculate_reward, added __repr__ and logging.
src/bsk_rl/data/resource_data.py	Added __repr__ to ResourceData for improved debug output.
src/bsk_rl/data/composition.py	Added __repr__ to ComposedData for improved debug output.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)

src/bsk_rl/data/rso_inspection.py:74

• [nitpick] In the __repr__, use the same naming as your properties for clarity (e.g., num_points_inspected= instead of inspected=) to avoid confusion when debugging.

    def __repr__(self) -> str:

src/bsk_rl/data/rso_inspection.py:74

• Add a unit test for RSOInspectionData.__repr__ to ensure the string format remains correct as fields evolve.

    def __repr__(self) -> str:

src/bsk_rl/data/resource_data.py:36

• Consider adding a unit test for ResourceData.__repr__ so changes to the representation will be caught by CI.

    def __repr__(self) -> str:

src/bsk_rl/data/composition.py:57

• Add a test for ComposedData.__repr__ to validate its output when composed of multiple data instances.

    def __repr__(self) -> str:

src/bsk_rl/data/rso_inspection.py:311

• Avoid using f-strings in logger calls directly; prefer parameterized logging (e.g., logger.info("Inspected/Illuminated/Total: %d/%d/%d", inspected, illuminated, total)) to defer formatting when the log level is disabled.

        logger.info(

[dhutererprats]

to be clear only the removal of lines 290-292 within rso_inspection.py are actually contributing to fixing this issue, correct? the rest is just info logging etc. from what I can tell

[Mark2000]

Yeah, just some logging that was used to debug but seems useful enough to keep

[dhutererprats]

okay, looks good