Skip to content

Add support for lossy HTJ2K#2420

Closed
palemieux wants to merge 2 commits into
AcademySoftwareFoundation:mainfrom
sandflow:feature/lossy-htj2k
Closed

Add support for lossy HTJ2K#2420
palemieux wants to merge 2 commits into
AcademySoftwareFoundation:mainfrom
sandflow:feature/lossy-htj2k

Conversation

@palemieux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@palemieux palemieux commented May 16, 2026

DRAFT DO NOT MERGE

@palemieux palemieux force-pushed the feature/lossy-htj2k branch from ea9ce78 to 830a27d Compare May 16, 2026 19:05
palemieux and others added 2 commits May 16, 2026 15:06
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@palemieux.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@palemieux.com>
@palemieux palemieux force-pushed the feature/lossy-htj2k branch from 830a27d to 55aec0f Compare May 16, 2026 19:06
@cary-ilm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I suggest merging this into a new feature branch lossy-htj2k for now, rather than main. That will make it easier to deploy for testing and evaluation.

And I'm not sure what's up with the Bazel build, it doesn't seem to like OpenJPH 0.27.

@palemieux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I suggest merging this into a new feature branch lossy-htj2k for now, rather than main. That will make it easier to deploy for testing and evaluation.

Perfect. I think a maintainer will need to create the branch?

And I'm not sure what's up with the Bazel build, it doesn't seem to like OpenJPH 0.27.

I was about to ask you. Any thought(s) would be most welcome.

@cary-ilm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I pushed a lossy-htj2k branch, see if that works.

@Vertexwahn, can you help decipher what's going wrong with the Bazel build?

@palemieux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@palemieux palemieux closed this May 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants