|
| 1 | +# 3DGS Epiphany Roadmap Plan — lance-graph |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Goal |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Collect high-leverage follow-up ideas discovered during the 3DGS planning pass. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +This file is intentionally exploratory. Promote items into separate plans when they become implementation-ready. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## 1. CHLOD: Certified Hierarchical Level of Detail |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Replace heuristic-only LOD with certified decisions. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +```text |
| 14 | +HLOD + error certificate + query relevance = CHLOD |
| 15 | +``` |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Key idea: |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +- parent tile can be accepted only if error certificate passes |
| 20 | +- child refinement is triggered by certified error, not just geometric error |
| 21 | +- stored certificates allow repeatable render decisions |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Potential crate: |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +```text |
| 26 | +crates/geo-chlod |
| 27 | +``` |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +## 2. 3DGS change detection with error envelopes |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Use certificates to distinguish real scene change from approximation artifact. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Pipeline: |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +```text |
| 36 | +scan A |
| 37 | +scan B |
| 38 | + -> align / normalize |
| 39 | + -> compare splat blocks and features |
| 40 | + -> subtract known error envelopes |
| 41 | + -> emit changed regions above confidence threshold |
| 42 | +``` |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Useful for: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- construction progress |
| 47 | +- infrastructure inspection |
| 48 | +- forestry |
| 49 | +- archaeology |
| 50 | +- digital twins |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +## 3. Query-aware foveated traversal |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Classic foveated rendering cares about camera gaze. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +Query-aware traversal also cares about semantic focus: |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +```text |
| 59 | +camera focus + query focus + certificate budget -> tile priority |
| 60 | +``` |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +Example: |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +- user selects pipe network |
| 65 | +- renderer refines splats near pipe assets |
| 66 | +- unrelated tiles stay coarse even if visually nearby |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +## 4. ArcGIS-compatible output mode |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +Goal: export enough 3D Tiles / FeatureServer-like resources to interoperate with GIS tools. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Do not reimplement full ArcGIS Server first. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +Start with: |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +- static 3D Tiles export |
| 77 | +- GeoJSON / vector overlay export |
| 78 | +- simple FeatureServer-like query endpoint for local data |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## 5. Lance-backed implicit subtree server |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Use Lance tables as the source of truth for implicit tiling. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +Endpoint generates subtree files from table rows and availability bitstreams. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Advantages: |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- no giant JSON tile trees |
| 89 | +- fast updates |
| 90 | +- compact change sets |
| 91 | +- queryable availability |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## 6. 3DGS tile compiler |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +Build a compiler: |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +```text |
| 98 | +raw splats / glTF / SPZ / photogrammetry output |
| 99 | + -> |
| 100 | +local frames |
| 101 | + -> |
| 102 | +HHTL partitioning |
| 103 | + -> |
| 104 | +3D Tiles + Lance sidecar |
| 105 | + -> |
| 106 | +certificates |
| 107 | +``` |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +This is likely the first impressive demo path. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +## 7. Scientific/medical sibling path |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +The same certified 3DGS machinery may work for volumetric ultrasound / medical field rendering. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +Shared concepts: |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +- splat-like anisotropic kernels |
| 118 | +- covariance projection |
| 119 | +- certified uncertainty |
| 120 | +- queryable metadata |
| 121 | +- CPU-first previews |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +Keep this as a sibling idea, not in the core geospatial path. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +## 8. Tile intelligence as graph |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +Represent the world as: |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +```text |
| 130 | +Tile -> Content -> SplatBlock -> Feature -> Asset -> Observation -> Certificate |
| 131 | +``` |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +This makes visual data queryable and auditable. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +The viewer becomes a spatial intelligence engine, not just a renderer. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +## 9. External compatibility envelope, internal columnar core |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +Recommended strategy: |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +```text |
| 142 | +external envelope: 3D Tiles / glTF / ArcGIS-compatible outputs |
| 143 | +internal core: Lance / Arrow / ndarray SIMD / certificates |
| 144 | +``` |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +This avoids fighting standards while still gaining performance and auditability. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +## 10. First demo target |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +Do not start with the whole planet. |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +Start with: |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +```text |
| 155 | +one small 3DGS scene |
| 156 | +one tileset.json |
| 157 | +one Lance sidecar |
| 158 | +one camera traversal request |
| 159 | +one certified decision report |
| 160 | +one CPU projection preview |
| 161 | +``` |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Then grow from there. |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +## Promotion criteria |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +Promote an epiphany into its own plan when: |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +- it has a clear crate owner |
| 170 | +- it has a testable input/output boundary |
| 171 | +- it can be built without blocking the base 3D Tiles runtime |
| 172 | +- it improves either compatibility, performance, or auditability |
0 commit comments