|
| 1 | +# PhiSpiral256 SoA Cross-System Integration Plan — lance-graph |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Goal |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Define how PhiSpiral256 integrates with lance-graph as a separate SoA lane for orthogonal local residual location. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +PhiSpiral256 must sit beside existing lanes without mixing meanings: |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +```text |
| 10 | +CAM_PQ |
| 11 | + meaning / semantic basin lane |
| 12 | +
|
| 13 | +PolarQuant |
| 14 | + magnitude / similarity lane |
| 15 | +
|
| 16 | +PhiSpiral256 |
| 17 | + orthogonal local residual location lane |
| 18 | +
|
| 19 | +BGZ17 |
| 20 | + golden offset/stride recoverable sampling skeleton |
| 21 | +
|
| 22 | +Fisher-z cosine |
| 23 | + optional scorer/gate after candidate ranking |
| 24 | +``` |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## Cross-system role |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +`ndarray` owns: |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +```text |
| 31 | +PhiSpiral256 center generation |
| 32 | +distance / neighbor tables |
| 33 | +atom16 pack/unpack |
| 34 | +local encode/decode kernels |
| 35 | +Fisher-z gate if used numerically |
| 36 | +``` |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +`lance-graph` owns: |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +```text |
| 41 | +SoA schema placement |
| 42 | +leaf packet graph relationships |
| 43 | +HHTL / CAM_PQ / PolarQuant / PhiSpiral lane composition |
| 44 | +candidate routing tables |
| 45 | +provenance and certificates |
| 46 | +integration fixtures |
| 47 | +``` |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +## Schema concept |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Use a leaf-location sidecar table first. Do not force PhiSpiral256 into unrelated graph structures. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +```text |
| 54 | +leaf_planetarium_atoms |
| 55 | + leaf_id: UInt64 |
| 56 | + atom_index: UInt8 |
| 57 | + atom16: UInt16 |
| 58 | + confidence_q: UInt8 |
| 59 | + cam_pq_id: UInt16? |
| 60 | + polarquant_id: UInt8? |
| 61 | + replay_ref: UInt64? |
| 62 | + certificate_id: Utf8? |
| 63 | +``` |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +Optional expanded debug view: |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +```text |
| 68 | +leaf_planetarium_atoms_debug |
| 69 | + leaf_id |
| 70 | + phi_spiral_id |
| 71 | + mag4 |
| 72 | + bgz_offset_family |
| 73 | + bgz_stride_family |
| 74 | + confidence_q |
| 75 | + cam_pq_id |
| 76 | + polarquant_id |
| 77 | + plane |
| 78 | +``` |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## Graph model |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +```text |
| 83 | +Leaf |
| 84 | + -> HAS_PLANETARIUM_ATOM -> PhiSpiralAtom |
| 85 | + -> HAS_MEANING_CODE -> CamPqCode |
| 86 | + -> HAS_MAGNITUDE_CODE -> PolarQuantCode |
| 87 | + -> HAS_RECOVERY_SCHEDULE -> BgzRecoverySchedule |
| 88 | + -> HAS_CERTIFICATE -> Certificate |
| 89 | +``` |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Keep atom nodes optional. For performance, atoms should primarily live in SoA tables. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## Route key |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +Callers may compose a route/candidate key: |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +```rust |
| 98 | +pub struct LeafPlanetariumRouteKey { |
| 99 | + pub cam_pq_id: u16, |
| 100 | + pub phi_spiral_id: u8, |
| 101 | + pub mag4: u8, |
| 102 | + pub bgz_offset_family: u8, |
| 103 | + pub bgz_stride_family: u8, |
| 104 | + pub plane: u8, |
| 105 | +} |
| 106 | +``` |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +This key is for routing or candidate lookup only. It does not redefine CAM_PQ, PolarQuant, BGZ17, or Fisher-z. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +## Candidate table |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +```text |
| 113 | +leaf_planetarium_candidates |
| 114 | + route_key_hash: UInt64 |
| 115 | + candidate_basin_id: UInt64 |
| 116 | + priority_q: UInt16 |
| 117 | + evidence_count: UInt32 |
| 118 | + last_calibrated_epoch: UInt64 |
| 119 | +``` |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +This enables: |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +```text |
| 124 | +route key -> candidate basin set |
| 125 | +``` |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +without forcing exact replay. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +## Calibration baselines |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +The integration must compare against: |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +```text |
| 134 | +Mag4 only |
| 135 | +BGZ17 L1 / weighted L1 |
| 136 | +BGZ17 sign agreement |
| 137 | +PolarQuant only |
| 138 | +PhiSpiral256 Euclidean |
| 139 | +PhiSpiral256 Poincare/Mobius |
| 140 | +PhiSpiral256 + Fisher-z gate |
| 141 | +Hybrid: CAM_PQ + PolarQuant + PhiSpiral256 + BGZ17 schedule |
| 142 | +``` |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +## Integration metrics |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +```text |
| 147 | +candidate fanout reduction |
| 148 | +leaf replay reduction |
| 149 | +route-key collision rate |
| 150 | +wrong-basin high-confidence rate |
| 151 | +SoA scan throughput |
| 152 | +atom table byte size |
| 153 | +candidate table byte size |
| 154 | +query latency impact |
| 155 | +calibration stability across datasets |
| 156 | +``` |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +## Fixtures |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +Start with synthetic fixtures: |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +```text |
| 163 | +single meaning axis |
| 164 | +orthogonal residual directions |
| 165 | +controlled missing locations |
| 166 | +known candidate basins |
| 167 | +known noisy / ambiguous cases |
| 168 | +``` |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +Then add real-ish fixtures: |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +```text |
| 173 | +CAM_PQ meaning codes |
| 174 | +BGZ17 residual fingerprints |
| 175 | +PolarQuant magnitude bands |
| 176 | +multi-atom leaf packets |
| 177 | +``` |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +## Query examples |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +```sql |
| 182 | +SELECT leaf_id, atom16, confidence_q |
| 183 | +FROM leaf_planetarium_atoms |
| 184 | +WHERE confidence_q >= 200; |
| 185 | +``` |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +```sql |
| 188 | +SELECT candidate_basin_id |
| 189 | +FROM leaf_planetarium_candidates |
| 190 | +WHERE route_key_hash = ? |
| 191 | +ORDER BY priority_q DESC |
| 192 | +LIMIT 8; |
| 193 | +``` |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +## Distortion and safety gates |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +Reject or widen candidates when: |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +```text |
| 200 | +spiral bin occupancy is too skewed |
| 201 | +route-key collision rate is too high |
| 202 | +Fisher-z margin is too small, if gate is enabled |
| 203 | +wrong-high-confidence rate rises above threshold |
| 204 | +multi-atom packets exceed configured K too often |
| 205 | +``` |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +## Implementation phases |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +```text |
| 210 | +Phase 0: plan docs and term separation |
| 211 | +Phase 1: ndarray PhiSpiral256 kernel + tests |
| 212 | +Phase 2: Lance/Arrow SoA table shape |
| 213 | +Phase 3: synthetic fixture and calibration report |
| 214 | +Phase 4: integrate with CAM_PQ / PolarQuant / BGZ17 lanes |
| 215 | +Phase 5: candidate table and route-key lookup |
| 216 | +Phase 6: real dataset replay reduction benchmark |
| 217 | +``` |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +## Acceptance criteria |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | +- PhiSpiral256 appears as its own lane in SoA schemas. |
| 222 | +- CAM_PQ, PolarQuant, BGZ17, Palette256, Fisher-z terminology remains separated. |
| 223 | +- Synthetic fixture proves better orthogonal location recall than Mag4-only. |
| 224 | +- Hybrid route key reduces candidate fanout or exact replay in at least one fixture. |
| 225 | +- Candidate table lookups are deterministic and explainable. |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +## Wall sentence |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +```text |
| 230 | +CAM_PQ says what it means, PolarQuant says how much, PhiSpiral256 says where the unexplained part lives, and BGZ17 remembers how to recover it. |
| 231 | +``` |
0 commit comments