|
| 1 | +## 2026-07-02 — E-BRICK3-CORRECTION-MINT-FACTORED-IS-SPLIT-BRAIN — the "corrected minter" exists only as the UNION of two diverged ruff branches; no branch carries both mint_factored AND soc.rs |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Status:** CORRECTION (of `E-BRICK3-RAN-TRUNCATION-DISALLOWED` + PR #625's |
| 4 | +`ast-as-partof-isa-address.md` "brick that ran" section, both of which state |
| 5 | +`mint_factored` shipped). |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +**The finding (review agent, ruff @ b459ec3, verified via git show/diffstat):** |
| 8 | +ruff main carries `ruff_spo_address::{mint, soc}` — the naive minter (with its |
| 9 | +own falsification recorded in its doc header) plus the 256-cap-is-a-lint |
| 10 | +classifier. **`mint_factored` + `RadixCodebook` + `ONTOLOGICAL-RADIX-TRIE.md` |
| 11 | +live ONLY on branch `claude/medcare-ruff-csharp-sync-4iahey` (tip `505fdc4`)**, |
| 12 | +which diverged BEFORE the soc promotion and therefore LACKS `soc.rs` (branch↔main |
| 13 | +diffstat: `soc.rs | 335 ---`). A naive merge of that branch would delete the |
| 14 | +lint. So: main ships the falsified minter; the corrected minter has never |
| 15 | +coexisted with the lint that motivated it. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +**Consequence:** the single highest-leverage small move in the address stack is |
| 18 | +rebasing `mint_factored`+`RadixCodebook` over main (conflict surface ≈ the |
| 19 | +`pub mod` line + doc header) so the corrected state exists on ONE branch. |
| 20 | +Until then, "brick-3's corrected form is shipped" is true only of the private |
| 21 | +probe run, not of public ruff main. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +**Process note:** my #625 record propagated the claim from the private archive's |
| 24 | +RESTORE-STATUS without re-verifying WHICH branch carried the code — the same |
| 25 | +verify-by-reading-not-by-inheriting failure mode as the stale-doc-comment |
| 26 | +episode (E-BRICK3 arc). Corrections cite their pass: surfaced by the 2026-07-02 |
| 27 | +OGAR+ruff review fan-out. |
| 28 | + |
1 | 29 | ## 2026-07-02 — E-V3-PLANNER-TWO-NATURES-AND-SPEED-PROBE (operator: planner too slow for sub-µs; resonance-based thinking is not DataFusion) |
2 | 30 | **Status:** FINDING (operator-ruled; speed claim probe-gated per truth-architect discipline) |
3 | 31 |
|
|
0 commit comments