Skip to content

doc: align README license with Apache 2.0#250

Merged
Agent-Hellboy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
doc/readme_apache_license
May 24, 2026
Merged

doc: align README license with Apache 2.0#250
Agent-Hellboy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
doc/readme_apache_license

Conversation

@Agent-Hellboy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Update the README License section to match the repository LICENSE file (Apache License 2.0).
  • The README previously listed MIT, which was out of date after the license change.

Test plan

  • Verified LICENSE is Apache 2.0
  • README license section now references LICENSE

Made with Cursor

The repository LICENSE is Apache 2.0; update the README section that
still incorrectly listed MIT.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@Agent-Hellboy Agent-Hellboy merged commit b7e098d into main May 24, 2026
13 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the license documentation in the README.md file, transitioning from MIT to Apache License 2.0. The reviewer suggested refining the phrasing to use the full formal name of the license and improving the link formatting for better clarity.

Comment thread README.md
## License

MIT
Apache License 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better clarity and to match the official name used in the LICENSE file, consider using the full formal name of the license. Additionally, linking the license name directly is a common practice that improves readability.

Suggested change
Apache License 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
Licensed under the [Apache License, Version 2.0](LICENSE).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant