Skip to content

Commit 9c9ecd6

Browse files
authored
Merge branch 'main' into main
2 parents b8b476f + 8b9f727 commit 9c9ecd6

4 files changed

Lines changed: 70 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

run.sh

100644100755
File mode changed.

tests/repo

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
1+
Subproject commit 7d5bc89eb71a33a435477526145bcea42baafad6

tests/scan_output.log

Lines changed: 64 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1+
🛡️ Booting ShieldCI Orchestrator...
2+
📋 Loaded shieldci.yml configuration
3+
⚙️ Running build: npm install
4+
5+
up to date, audited 192 packages in 685ms
6+
7+
26 packages are looking for funding
8+
run `npm fund` for details
9+
10+
7 vulnerabilities (2 low, 5 high)
11+
12+
To address all issues (including breaking changes), run:
13+
npm audit fix --force
14+
15+
Run `npm audit` for details.
16+
🚀 Launching Node.js server on http://127.0.0.1:3000...
17+
⏳ Waiting for target http://127.0.0.1:3000 to come online...
18+
✅ Target is up and responding!
19+
Recursively flattening codebase for full context...
20+
21+
📋 Test Plan (5 tests):
22+
1. [RECON: Port Scan] nmap_scan → http://host.docker.internal:3000
23+
2. [RECON: Security Headers] check_headers → http://host.docker.internal:3000
24+
3. [VULN SCAN: Web Server] nikto_scan → http://host.docker.internal:3000
25+
4. [DISCOVERY: Hidden Paths] gobuster_scan → http://host.docker.internal:3000
26+
5. [SQLi: GET /login] sqlmap_scan → http://host.docker.internal:3000/login?username=test
27+
28+
--- Test 1/5: RECON: Port Scan ---
29+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: nmap_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000
30+
[03/07/26 02:07:37] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
31+
CallToolRequest
32+
33+
--- Test 2/5: RECON: Security Headers ---
34+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: check_headers on http://host.docker.internal:3000
35+
[03/07/26 02:07:38] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
36+
CallToolRequest
37+
38+
--- Test 3/5: VULN SCAN: Web Server ---
39+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: nikto_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000
40+
[03/07/26 02:07:39] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
41+
CallToolRequest
42+
43+
--- Test 4/5: DISCOVERY: Hidden Paths ---
44+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: gobuster_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000
45+
[03/07/26 02:07:53] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
46+
CallToolRequest
47+
48+
--- Test 5/5: SQLi: GET /login ---
49+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: sqlmap_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000/login?username=test
50+
[03/07/26 02:07:54] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
51+
CallToolRequest
52+
53+
--- Adaptive Strike 1 ---
54+
🧠 Invoking local model via Ollama API...
55+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: sqlmap_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000/login?username=admin
56+
[03/07/26 02:08:01] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
57+
CallToolRequest
58+
59+
--- Adaptive Strike 2 ---
60+
🧠 Invoking local model via Ollama API...
61+
🤝 Initiating MCP Handshake & Strike: sqlmap_scan on http://host.docker.internal:3000/login?username=test
62+
[03/07/26 02:08:09] INFO Processing request of type server.py:720
63+
CallToolRequest
64+
📝 Compiling final security assessment...

tests/shield_results.json

Lines changed: 5 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
1+
{
2+
"status": "Clean",
3+
"vulnerabilities": [],
4+
"report_markdown": "The provided code snippets are quite extensive, and I'll focus on the most critical vulnerabilities and provide corrected versions.\n\n**1. SQL Injection Vulnerability in `/login` Route**\n\nThe `GET /login` route is vulnerable to SQL injection. The issue lies in the following line:\n```javascript\nconst query = \"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '\" + user + \"'\";\n```\nHere, the `user` parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. For example, if an attacker enters `Robert'); DROP TABLE users; --`, the query would become:\n```sql\nSELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'Robert'); DROP TABLE users; --'\n```\nThis would execute the malicious query, dropping the `users` table.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n```javascript\nconst query = \"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ? \";\ndb.get(query, [user], (err, row) => {\n // ...\n});\n```\nIn this corrected version, we use a parameterized query with a parameter `?`, which is replaced with the actual `user` value. This prevents SQL injection attacks.\n\n**2. Code Injection Vulnerability in `app.js`**\n\nIn the `/login` route, there's a code injection vulnerability in the following line:\n```javascript\nconst query = \"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '\" + user + \"'\";\n```\nSimilarly, the `user` parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code. However, this vulnerability is more related to the fact that the query is being constructed as a string, making it vulnerable to code injection.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent code injection.\n\n**3. Path Traversal Vulnerability in `app.js`**\n\nIn the `/login` route, there's a path traversal vulnerability in the following line:\n```javascript\nconst user = req.query.username || '';\nconst query = \"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '\" + user + \"'\";\n```\nIf an attacker enters a specially crafted `username` parameter, they could traverse the file system and access sensitive files.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a parameterized query or prepared statement to prevent path traversal.\n\n**4. Security Misconfiguration in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `sqlite3` library, which is not secure for production environments. The `serialize()` method is used, which can lead to unexpected behavior and security issues.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a more secure database library, such as `pg` or `mysql2`, and ensure proper error handling and security configurations.\n\n**5. Command Injection Vulnerability in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `sqlite3` library, which is vulnerable to command injection attacks.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a parameterized query or prepared statement to prevent command injection.\n\n**6. Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `users` table, which contains sensitive user data. However, the route does not properly validate or sanitize the `username` parameter, allowing an attacker to access sensitive user data.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse proper input validation and sanitization to prevent IDOR attacks.\n\n**7. Insecure Password Storage in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route stores passwords in plaintext, which is a significant security risk.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a secure password hashing library, such as `bcrypt`, to store passwords securely.\n\n**8. Security Misconfiguration in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `express` library, which has several security-related configuration options. However, the route does not properly configure these options, leading to potential security issues.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nProperly configure the `express` library to ensure security settings are enabled.\n\n**9. Insecure Deserialization in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `sqlite3` library, which is vulnerable to insecure deserialization attacks.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a secure deserialization library, such as `pg`, and ensure proper error handling and security configurations.\n\n**10. Security Misconfiguration in `app.js`**\n\nThe `/login` route uses the `sqlite3` library, which is not secure for production environments. The `serialize()` method is used, which can lead to unexpected behavior and security issues.\n\n**Corrected Version:**\n\nUse a more secure database library, such as `pg` or `mysql2`, and ensure proper error handling and security configurations.\n\nThese vulnerabilities are significant, and it's essential to address them to ensure the security of your application."
5+
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)