[O2B-1460] Filtering on Runs per LHC Period overview page

[xsalonx]

I have a JIRA ticket

• branch and/or PR name(s) include(s) JIRA ID
• issue has "Fix version" assigned
• issue "Status" is set to "In review"
• PR labels are selected

Notable changes for users:

• Add filters to Runs Per LHC Period ovreview page: by run, fill, start, stop, L3/dipole, INEL values

Notable changes for developers:

• Refactor RunsPerLhcPeriodModel to use LHC Period ID instead of its name

Changes made to the database:

• NA

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 45.75%. Comparing base (e40cbb4) to head (c6b68d0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...Runs/RunPerPeriod/RunsPerLhcPeriodOverviewModel.js	0.00%	30 Missing ⚠️
.../Runs/RunPerPeriod/RunsPerLhcPeriodOverviewPage.js	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
lib/public/views/Runs/RunsModel.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1957      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   45.81%   45.75%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1019     1019              
  Lines       16863    16885      +22     
  Branches     3041     3038       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits         7725     7726       +1     
- Misses       9138     9159      +21     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[xsalonx]

To be merged after #1955

[graduta]

Given that the runs request already contains both the lhcPeriodId and lhcPeriodName and on top of that the table bug in which the request for runs and now for lhcPeriodStatistics are duplicated, is it worth doing a statistics request here on load?
I cannot see any other data being used from this request that would be displayed on the page