we may be able to start aligning these representations without breaking anything - input_data is a DataAsset object with a s3 url, while source_data is just an asset name.
maybe we want to allow either url or name in the DataAsset as a non-breaking change and move in practice to name?
we should also check more thoroughly on input_data usage - did the upgrader drop any input_data represented in 1.0? does the transfer service use this field?
we may be able to start aligning these representations without breaking anything - input_data is a DataAsset object with a s3 url, while source_data is just an asset name.
maybe we want to allow either url or name in the DataAsset as a non-breaking change and move in practice to name?
we should also check more thoroughly on input_data usage - did the upgrader drop any input_data represented in 1.0? does the transfer service use this field?