Commit 42c4ada
authored
Optimize notification unread polling (#987)
## Summary
- Gate `limit=0` notification unread polling behind the fast
single-recipient path before touching the broader multi-recipient GIN
scan.
- Add a concurrent partial GIN index for multi-recipient
`notification.user_ids` rows.
- Cover capped unread count and single/multi group dedupe behavior in
tests.
## Live analysis
- Current bridge reads; replication lag was ms-level during the
investigation.
- Remaining `/v1/notifications/:userId` 504s were low-volume but
concentrated in a few users, with requests timing out at the 8s
notification read deadline.
- Read-only EXPLAIN against the replica for top user `DvEvv`/`77214`
improved the unread poll shape from roughly 132ms / 39,651 buffer hits
to roughly 14ms / 1,132 buffer hits by avoiding the multi-recipient
branch when the single-recipient branch already satisfied the capped
unread count.
- User `eJ57D`/`51` showed the same branch-elision behavior.
- Residual users with fewer than 20 single-recipient unread groups still
need the fallback, so the partial multi-recipient GIN index targets that
path.
## Testing
- `go test ./api -run '^$'`
- `git diff --check`
Note: focused notification integration tests could not run locally
because the local test Postgres at `localhost:21300` was not running.1 parent e2849c8 commit 42c4ada
3 files changed
Lines changed: 104 additions & 6 deletions
File tree
- api
- ddl/migrations
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
74 | 74 | | |
75 | 75 | | |
76 | 76 | | |
77 | | - | |
| 77 | + | |
78 | 78 | | |
79 | 79 | | |
80 | 80 | | |
| |||
84 | 84 | | |
85 | 85 | | |
86 | 86 | | |
87 | | - | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
88 | 97 | | |
89 | 98 | | |
90 | 99 | | |
91 | | - | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
92 | 102 | | |
93 | 103 | | |
94 | 104 | | |
95 | 105 | | |
96 | 106 | | |
| 107 | + | |
| 108 | + | |
| 109 | + | |
| 110 | + | |
| 111 | + | |
| 112 | + | |
| 113 | + | |
| 114 | + | |
97 | 115 | | |
98 | 116 | | |
99 | 117 | | |
100 | | - | |
101 | | - | |
102 | | - | |
| 118 | + | |
| 119 | + | |
| 120 | + | |
103 | 121 | | |
104 | 122 | | |
105 | 123 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
152 | 152 | | |
153 | 153 | | |
154 | 154 | | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
| 176 | + | |
| 177 | + | |
| 178 | + | |
| 179 | + | |
| 180 | + | |
| 181 | + | |
| 182 | + | |
| 183 | + | |
| 184 | + | |
| 185 | + | |
| 186 | + | |
| 187 | + | |
| 188 | + | |
| 189 | + | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
| 194 | + | |
| 195 | + | |
| 196 | + | |
| 197 | + | |
| 198 | + | |
| 199 | + | |
| 200 | + | |
| 201 | + | |
| 202 | + | |
| 203 | + | |
| 204 | + | |
| 205 | + | |
| 206 | + | |
| 207 | + | |
| 208 | + | |
| 209 | + | |
| 210 | + | |
| 211 | + | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + | |
| 214 | + | |
| 215 | + | |
| 216 | + | |
| 217 | + | |
| 218 | + | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + | |
155 | 221 | | |
156 | 222 | | |
157 | 223 | | |
| |||
Lines changed: 14 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
0 commit comments