Commit bcc37cf
committed
test(fast-inbox): seed the inbox before the checkpoint's L1 block in propose harnesses (A-1384)
Both propose harnesses warped to the checkpoint's timestamp and only then sent their
L1-to-L2 messages, so the checkpoint referenced a bucket still accumulating in the
same L1 block. Propose rejects that reference: the snapshot could still be overwritten
in place. Sending the messages first puts them in an earlier L1 block, which is what
the sequencer does anyway, since it never selects a bucket younger than the inbox lag.1 parent 3642c4d commit bcc37cf
2 files changed
Lines changed: 10 additions & 6 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
165 | 165 | | |
166 | 166 | | |
167 | 167 | | |
168 | | - | |
169 | | - | |
170 | | - | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
171 | 170 | | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
172 | 174 | | |
173 | 175 | | |
174 | 176 | | |
| |||
Lines changed: 5 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
531 | 531 | | |
532 | 532 | | |
533 | 533 | | |
534 | | - | |
535 | | - | |
536 | | - | |
| 534 | + | |
| 535 | + | |
537 | 536 | | |
538 | 537 | | |
| 538 | + | |
| 539 | + | |
| 540 | + | |
539 | 541 | | |
540 | 542 | | |
541 | 543 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments