Skip to content

Suppress false-positive CodeQL warning in RemoteOrchestrationServiceClient#1347

Merged
AnatoliB merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
anatolib/codeql-fix-37181654-2
May 11, 2026
Merged

Suppress false-positive CodeQL warning in RemoteOrchestrationServiceClient#1347
AnatoliB merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
anatolib/codeql-fix-37181654-2

Conversation

@AnatoliB

@AnatoliB AnatoliB commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…nAsync method

Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR aims to eliminate a reported false-positive CodeQL warning in the Azure Service Fabric remote orchestration client by adding targeted suppressions and documenting why TypeNameHandling.All is used on the request serialization path.

Changes:

  • Added SuppressMessage attributes for CA2326/CA2327 around PutJsonAsync.
  • Added an inline comment describing why the JsonMediaTypeFormatter uses TypeNameHandling.All and why the finding is considered a false positive.
  • Added System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis import to support the suppressions.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread src/DurableTask.AzureServiceFabric/Remote/RemoteOrchestrationServiceClient.cs Outdated
AnatoliB and others added 2 commits May 1, 2026 11:39
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@AnatoliB AnatoliB merged commit 1a1349b into main May 11, 2026
51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants