fix(license): clarify CanUseTieredStorage comment — feature-based, not tier-based

Ignacio Van Droogenbroeck · claude · Ignacio Van Droogenbroeck · commit cb1c4dc042de · 2026-04-01T16:55:42.000-06:00
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 &lt;noreply@anthropic.com&gt;
diff --git a/internal/license/license.go b/internal/license/license.go
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ func (l *License) CanUseRetentionScheduler() bool {
 }
 
 // CanUseTieredStorage returns true if the license allows tiered storage
-// Requires enterprise license with the tiered_storage feature
+// Requires license with tiered_storage feature enabled
 func (l *License) CanUseTieredStorage() bool {
 	return l.HasFeature(FeatureTieredStorage)
 }

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ func (l *License) CanUseRetentionScheduler() bool {`
`100`	`100`	`}`
`101`	`101`
`102`	`102`	`// CanUseTieredStorage returns true if the license allows tiered storage`
`103`		`-// Requires enterprise license with the tiered_storage feature`
	`103`	`+// Requires license with tiered_storage feature enabled`
`104`	`104`	`func (l *License) CanUseTieredStorage() bool {`
`105`	`105`	`return l.HasFeature(FeatureTieredStorage)`
`106`	`106`	`}`