Skip to content

Agent Executors Missing Actions Implementation#28

Closed
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
agent-executors-missing-actions
Closed

Agent Executors Missing Actions Implementation#28
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
agent-executors-missing-actions

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Implemented LoginExecutor for ActionExecuteLoginSequence using heuristics to fill login forms.
Implemented ControlExecutor for ActionDecideNextStep to allow dynamic plan adjustments.
Added stub for ActionFuzzEndpoint.
Refactored AnalysisExecutor to optimize analyzer type checking.
Updated internal/agent/models.go with ActionDecideNextStep.
Updated tests to cover new executors and fix existing test expectations.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5156527309278469625 started by @xkilldash9x

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

ensureVisible := true
opts := &humanoid.InteractionOptions{EnsureVisible: &ensureVisible}

e.logger.Debug("Filling login form", zap.String("username_selector", userSel), zap.String("password_selector", passSel))

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

Sensitive data returned by an access to passwordSelectors
flows to a logging call.

Copilot Autofix

AI 5 months ago

The recommended fix is to remove logging the password field’s selector (zap.String("password_selector", passSel)) from the log statement at line 133 of internal/agent/login_executor.go. This avoids logging information linked to password fields. The log can still contain the username selector for useful diagnostics.

Steps to implement:

  • Edit line 133 to remove zap.String("password_selector", passSel) from the logger call.
  • The resulting logger call will only log the username selector (and message).

There is no need to add imports, external packages, or methods.


Suggested changeset 1
internal/agent/login_executor.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/internal/agent/login_executor.go b/internal/agent/login_executor.go
--- a/internal/agent/login_executor.go
+++ b/internal/agent/login_executor.go
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 	ensureVisible := true
 	opts := &humanoid.InteractionOptions{EnsureVisible: &ensureVisible}
 
-	e.logger.Debug("Filling login form", zap.String("username_selector", userSel), zap.String("password_selector", passSel))
+	e.logger.Debug("Filling login form", zap.String("username_selector", userSel))
 
 	if err := h.Type(ctx, userSel, username, opts); err != nil {
 		return e.handleError(err, action)
EOF
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
ensureVisible := true
opts := &humanoid.InteractionOptions{EnsureVisible: &ensureVisible}

e.logger.Debug("Filling login form", zap.String("username_selector", userSel), zap.String("password_selector", passSel))
e.logger.Debug("Filling login form", zap.String("username_selector", userSel))

if err := h.Type(ctx, userSel, username, opts); err != nil {
return e.handleError(err, action)
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants