feat(algorithms, binary-search): divide chocolate#126
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe PR adds a new "Divide Chocolate" problem under binary search (implementation, README, tests) and updates the directory; plus a cosmetic quote change in an unrelated interval module. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are self-contained algorithm and tests without multi-component control-flow that would benefit from a sequence diagram) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.md (1)
50-52: Minor naming inconsistency.The documentation refers to
canDivide(camelCase), but the actual implementation usescan_divide(snake_case). The implementation correctly follows Python naming conventions. Consider updating the documentation to match: "Use the helper functioncan_divide(sweetness, k, mid)..."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
DIRECTORY.mdalgorithms/intervals/remove_intervals/__init__.pyalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.mdalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.pyalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py (1)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (2)
maximize_sweetness(4-33)maximize_sweetness_2(36-54)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (1)
algorithms/search/trie/search_suggestions/__init__.py (1)
lower_bound(5-24)
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.md
[style] ~4-~4: Consider a more expressive alternative.
Context: ... share the chocolate with k friends. To do this, you’ll make k cuts to divide the ...
(DO_ACHIEVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
DIRECTORY.md
123-123: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6
(MD007, ul-indent)
124-124: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 6; Actual: 8
(MD007, ul-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
DIRECTORY.md (1)
123-124: LGTM!The directory entry correctly documents the new "Divide Chocolate" feature under Binary Search. The indentation is consistent with other entries in this section.
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (2)
4-33: LGTM!The binary search implementation is correct. The
+ 1in line 19's mid calculation (mid = (lower_bound + upper_bound + 1) // 2) is crucial to prevent infinite loops whenlower_boundandupper_boundare adjacent values. The inline feasibility check efficiently counts pieces without a separate helper function.
36-54: LGTM!This alternative binary search implementation is also correct and uses a different but equally valid pattern (tracking
resultseparately withwhile low <= high). Having both implementations demonstrates different approaches to the same problem, which is educational.algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py (1)
1-28: LGTM!Excellent test coverage with parameterized tests validating both implementations against the same test cases. The test cases cover important scenarios including edge cases (k=0, uniform sweetness, etc.). This ensures both
maximize_sweetnessandmaximize_sweetness_2produce consistent results.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Describe your change:
Divide chocolate algorithm problem
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Style
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.