Skip to content

CABLE Library for AM3/ACCESS3#724

Open
Whyborn wants to merge 31 commits into
mainfrom
make-AM3-library
Open

CABLE Library for AM3/ACCESS3#724
Whyborn wants to merge 31 commits into
mainfrom
make-AM3-library

Conversation

@Whyborn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Whyborn Whyborn commented May 22, 2026

CABLE

Thank you for submitting a pull request to the CABLE Project.

Description

This builds the library for AM3 and future ACCESS3 applications. It requires a rejig of the original library, taking some files out of the default library and including them only in ESM1.6. The intention was that the library would only be the science code, but this is not possible with the current setup.

A summary of things that the science directory depends on, that extends outside the science directory that I've identified:

  • The biogeophysics derived types are not defined within the science directory, as opposed to the CASA derived types which are defined within the science directory. Each of these have different definitions for each application (offline, ESM1.6, AM3). Logically, there should only be one definition, but I don't think this will happen any time soon. In the mean time, including the type modules in src/coupled/AM3/control/cable/CM3 in the library should be an acceptable solution.
  • The trickier problems are the namelists and surface types handling. These are related issues, as the cable_surface_types_mod module also reads the namelist that sets the CABLE surface types. Do the surface types need to be handled in this way? Is there any foreseeable situation where anyone would not use the standard CABLE PFT indexing? If we remove this, it makes things significantly easier. It also does the extra work of defining a bunch of required JULES variables. I think the best solution is go back to hard-coded CABLE PFT indices, see this JULES PR.

Testing

  • Are the changes bitwise-compatible with the main branch? If working on an optional feature, are the results bitwise-compatible when this feature is off? If yes, copy benchcab output showing successful completion of the bitwise compatibility tests or equivalent results below this line.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cable--724.org.readthedocs.build/en/724/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant