Replies: 2 comments
-
No, sorry. I maintain CANnectivity, not BSPs.
I may be a nice solution for you, but I would be stuck with maintaining ports for boards I don't have and don't really have an interest in maintaining support for. Long story short, board support needs to go into upstream Zephyr if a board overlay is needed in CANnectivity. Another option is to keep your board support + CANnectivity board overlay in a downstream repository. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Understandable and I thought that might be the case. Thanks reply. I'll probably keep the boards folder in the project repo and suggest using the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Related to #159: would you be open to a workspace boards folder specifically for hardware targeting CANnectivity that probably don't warrant being added to upstream in Zephyr?
I've created a V2 of my Entree board that supports CANnecitivity. I have a fork which includes a 'boards' folder in the CANnectivity workspace: main...tuna-f1sh:cannectivity:stm32g01b (still slightly WIP).
It seems like a nice solution for boards specifically designed for CANnectivity, which cannot be defined with an overlay but where the uses within Zephyr as a 'board' are less obvious.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions