No cover some stuff#146
Conversation
Coverage reportClick to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After looking at this up close, we loose all the static typing by doing While verbose, it helps to have the typing info while working with the code. I would like to move towards adding typing as suggested in #124. |
|
@hosaka Could you please take another look at this? Thanks! |
|
@johnzhou721 Sorry I've neglected this for a bit. I think this doesn't add much value to be frank. The I feel at this point that peppering more "no cover" is not of much use. I am going to close this for now, if you you'd like to improve the test coverage and have spare time, feel free to PR changes that address this. |
|
Alright, this doesn't bother me.
|
No description provided.