Skip to content

fix: consistent shtrove record identifiers#11761

Open
aaxelb wants to merge 1 commit into
CenterForOpenScience:feature/es2-consolidationfrom
aaxelb:fix/consistent-shtrove-supplement-ids
Open

fix: consistent shtrove record identifiers#11761
aaxelb wants to merge 1 commit into
CenterForOpenScience:feature/es2-consolidationfrom
aaxelb:fix/consistent-shtrove-supplement-ids

Conversation

@aaxelb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aaxelb aaxelb commented Jun 3, 2026

when sending cedar records to shtrove as supplementary records about an item, use that item's osfid in the record_identifier instead of a database id, so the records are more clearly associated in shtrove admin

Ticket

Purpose

Changes

Side Effects

QE Notes

CE Notes

Documentation

@aaxelb aaxelb marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2026 18:51
@adlius
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

adlius commented Jun 4, 2026

There are some test failures.

when sending cedar records to shtrove as supplementary records about an
item, use that item's osfid in the record_identifier instead of a
database id, so the records are more clearly associated in shtrove admin
@aaxelb aaxelb force-pushed the fix/consistent-shtrove-supplement-ids branch from e212fdb to 3048525 Compare June 4, 2026 12:15
@aaxelb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

aaxelb commented Jun 4, 2026

@adlius oops sorry, shoulda waited -- passing now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants