Draft: investigate union projection selector error#9068
Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Add reproduction test for issue 9063
Draft: investigate union projection selector error
Jan 27, 2026
Member
|
@copilot Can you actually create the test? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Union field projections on a single abstract property currently throw when building selectors (e.g., inline fragments on
IInspectionTrigger). The issue surfaces as a missing property on the abstract type during QueryContext selector construction.Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.