diff --git a/docs/source/submission.md b/docs/source/submission.md
index 0c9aee3cbe..2c90d2e84d 100644
--- a/docs/source/submission.md
+++ b/docs/source/submission.md
@@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ Upon receiving a message from `submission_task_queue` with a binding key of `sub
 
 * Finally, the temporary computation directory allocated for this submission is removed.
 
+## Submission Invariants
+
+The submission workflow enforces a set of invariants to ensure challenge integrity.
+See [Submission Workflow Invariants](submission_workflow_invariants.md) for details.
+
 ### Notes
 
 * REST API with url pattern `jobs:challenge_submission`. Here _jobs_ is application namespace and _challenge_submission_ is instance namespace. You can read more about [url namespace](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/http/urls/#url-namespaces)
diff --git a/docs/source/submission_workflow_invariants.md b/docs/source/submission_workflow_invariants.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f3e6dede46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/source/submission_workflow_invariants.md
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Submission Workflow Invariants
+
+The submission API in EvalAI enforces a set of invariants to ensure challenge integrity and prevent invalid submissions.
+These rules are enforced at the API layer and are fundamental to how submissions are handled across challenges.
+
+This document describes those invariants and the reasoning behind them.
+
+---
+
+## Core Invariants
+
+The submission workflow must satisfy the following rules:
+
+- Submissions must be rejected if the challenge or challenge phase is inactive.
+- Only participant teams that are registered for a challenge are allowed to submit.
+- Submission requests must be authenticated before workflow invariants are evaluated.
+
+These represent a subset of the fundamental invariants enforced by the submission workflow and apply regardless of client behavior.
+
+---
+
+## Why These Invariants Matter
+
+These rules ensure that only valid submissions enter the system.
+By enforcing them early in the request lifecycle, EvalAI prevents inconsistent state and avoids downstream issues in scoring, evaluation, and leaderboards.
+
+Making these constraints explicit also helps contributors reason about expected behavior and avoid introducing regressions.
+
+---
+
+## Testing Approach
+
+These invariants are intended to be validated using API-level workflow tests rather than unit tests of internal functions.
+
+Each workflow test:
+- Satisfies only the required preconditions
+- Violates exactly one invariant
+- Asserts both the API response and the absence of side effects (for example, ensuring that no `Submission` object is created)
+
+This approach helps keep tests stable while clearly documenting the guarantees provided by the submission workflow.