nit

Author: john-b-yang

pages/insights/20251108_human_ai.md

@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
 
 One could imagine analyses that dig deeper, such as...
 
-* Seeing how opponent units are behaving (are they clustering around weak units?)
+* Seeing how opponent units are behaving (are they clustering around weak units? How do opponents' healthy vs. damaged units behave differently?)
 * Write analyses that digest simulations from multiple rounds.
 
 **3. Misinterpretations**: Finally, a snippet of some fairly crucial mis-interpretations of prior results:
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ This is arguably okay, but...
 > THOUGHT (Step 5): Perfect! All sampled games show Blue (us) winning consistently with 40 units vs Red's 3-4 units. The spawn avoidance is working well...
 
 This is unfortunately the wrong conclusion.
+Given this flawed insight, the rest of the changes this round are, as shown, not effective.
 
 ## Concluding Thoughts