Skip to content

TEST_SCENARIOS.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
197 lines (145 loc) · 5.73 KB

TEST_SCENARIOS.md

File metadata and controls

197 lines (145 loc) · 5.73 KB
Raw

Antigravity OS - Test Scenarios Matrix

Date: 2026-01-21
Protocol: SOVEREIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE (SQA)
Status: 🔄 IN PROGRESS

Test Categories

1. MCP Loopback Test

Objective: Verify that Kiro can call its own MCP tools successfully

Test Cases:

  • 1.1 Call get_system_context and validate response structure
  • 1.2 Call validate_environment with test dependencies
  • 1.3 Call sovereign_execute with safe command
  • 1.4 Call trigger_ralph_loop in health-check mode
  • 1.5 Verify all tools return valid JSON
  • 1.6 Measure response time (<500ms per tool)

Success Criteria: All 4 tools respond with valid data, no errors

2. Infrastructure Integrity

Objective: Validate infrastructure management and cleanup

Test Cases:

  • 2.1 Check Docker availability
  • 2.2 List active containers
  • 2.3 List active images
  • 2.4 Verify port availability check
  • 2.5 Test file system operations (read/write/delete)
  • 2.6 Validate telemetry logging

Success Criteria: All infrastructure queries return accurate data

3. Chaos Engineering (Self-Healing)

Objective: Test Ralph-Loop's ability to detect and fix failures within 30 seconds

Test Cases:

  • 3.1 Simulate TypeScript compilation error
  • 3.2 Simulate test failure
  • 3.3 Simulate missing dependency
  • 3.4 Simulate runtime error
  • 3.5 Verify Ralph-Loop triggers automatically
  • 3.6 Verify correction is applied
  • 3.7 Verify system recovers within 30 seconds

Success Criteria: Ralph-Loop detects error, generates correction, applies fix, system recovers

Interactive Checkpoint: Choose failure scenario:

  1. TypeScript compilation error
  2. Test assertion failure
  3. Missing npm package
  4. Runtime null reference error

4. Multi-Provider Switch

Objective: Test handover between local and cloud LLM providers

Test Cases:

  • 4.1 Detect Ollama availability
  • 4.2 Test local LLM validation (if available)
  • 4.3 Test cloud LLM generation
  • 4.4 Verify routing logic (local for validation, cloud for generation)
  • 4.5 Measure latency difference

Success Criteria: System correctly routes workloads based on provider availability

Interactive Checkpoint: Do you have Ollama installed locally?

  1. Yes - Test full multi-provider switching
  2. No - Test cloud-only mode

5. PWA & Mobile Readiness

Objective: Validate Progressive Web App features and responsive design

Test Cases:

  • 5.1 Verify manifest.json exists and is valid
  • 5.2 Check service worker registration
  • 5.3 Test CSS breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop)
  • 5.4 Verify offline capability
  • 5.5 Test touch interactions
  • 5.6 Validate accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation)

Success Criteria: App is installable, works offline, responsive on all devices

6. API Endpoint Health

Objective: Verify all API endpoints are functional

Test Cases:

  • 6.1 GET /api/telemetry - Returns telemetry data
  • 6.2 GET /api/system/docker - Returns Docker status
  • 6.3 GET /api/system/ports - Returns port status
  • 6.4 POST /api/system/reset - Resets system state
  • 6.5 Verify CORS headers
  • 6.6 Verify error handling (404, 500)

Success Criteria: All endpoints respond with correct status codes and data

7. Observer Console Real-Time Updates

Objective: Test WebSocket connections and real-time UI updates

Test Cases:

  • 7.1 Connect to WebSocket server (port 3002)
  • 7.2 Verify initial state push
  • 7.3 Trigger tool invocation, verify UI update
  • 7.4 Verify neon pulse animation triggers
  • 7.5 Test connection recovery after disconnect
  • 7.6 Verify metrics update in real-time

Success Criteria: WebSocket connects, UI updates in <100ms, animations trigger

8. Constitutional Validation

Objective: Verify 13 Articles of the Constitution are enforced

Test Cases:

  • 8.1 Test destructive command rejection (rm -rf /)
  • 8.2 Test Docker whitelist enforcement
  • 8.3 Test sensitive directory protection (.git, node_modules)
  • 8.4 Test command timeout enforcement
  • 8.5 Verify violation logging
  • 8.6 Test safe command execution

Success Criteria: All violations blocked, safe commands execute

9. Spec-Driven Workflow

Objective: Validate complete spec-to-production pipeline

Test Cases:

  • 9.1 Load spec from .kiro/specs/
  • 9.2 Parse requirements.md
  • 9.3 Parse design.md with properties
  • 9.4 Parse tasks.md with status
  • 9.5 Execute task and update status
  • 9.6 Run tests automatically
  • 9.7 Verify task completion

Success Criteria: Complete workflow executes without manual intervention

10. Performance & Load Testing

Objective: Measure system performance under load

Test Cases:

  • 10.1 Measure MCP tool response time (target: <500ms)
  • 10.2 Measure API endpoint response time (target: <200ms)
  • 10.3 Test concurrent tool invocations (10 simultaneous)
  • 10.4 Measure memory usage during execution
  • 10.5 Test with large spec files (1000+ tasks)
  • 10.6 Verify no memory leaks

Success Criteria: All operations complete within target times, no crashes

Execution Order

  1. ✅ MCP Loopback Test (Automated - Execute Now)
  2. ⏸️ Infrastructure Integrity (Automated - After #1)
  3. ⏸️ Chaos Engineering (Interactive - Requires user choice)
  4. ⏸️ Multi-Provider Switch (Interactive - Requires user choice)
  5. ⏸️ PWA & Mobile Readiness (Automated)
  6. ⏸️ API Endpoint Health (Automated)
  7. ⏸️ Observer Console (Manual - Requires browser)
  8. ⏸️ Constitutional Validation (Automated)
  9. ⏸️ Spec-Driven Workflow (Automated)
  10. ⏸️ Performance & Load Testing (Automated)

Test Execution Log

Scenario 1: MCP Loopback Test

Status: 🔄 EXECUTING... Started: 2026-01-21

Generated by: Kiro Agent
Protocol: SQA v1.0
Last Updated: 2026-01-21