Skip to content

Manchester | 26-ITP-Jan | Ofonime Edak | Sprint 1 | Data group#1045

Open
Ofonimeedak wants to merge 10 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Ofonimeedak:datagroup/sprint1-coursework
Open

Manchester | 26-ITP-Jan | Ofonime Edak | Sprint 1 | Data group#1045
Ofonimeedak wants to merge 10 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Ofonimeedak:datagroup/sprint1-coursework

Conversation

@Ofonimeedak
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Self checklist

  • I have titled my PR with Region | Cohort | FirstName LastName | Sprint | Assignment Title
  • My changes meet the requirements of the task
  • I have tested my changes
  • My changes follow the style guide

Changelist

I have made changes to the following files, sum.js,include.js and all test cases
I have followed the acceptance criteria for all katas
This PR contains functions for de-duplication and summation of arrays
It also contained a refactored function and different test cases

@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added 📅 Sprint 1 Assigned during Sprint 1 of this module Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. Module-Data-Groups The name of the module. labels Mar 19, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cjyuan cjyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not practice "committing files one by one, on purpose, and for a reason"?
In VSCode, you can select which file to stage, and commit only the staged file.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5jZ9lrSpqk&t=705 (At around 12:50 minute marker, the video shows how to stage a single file).

Comment on lines +47 to +52
[{ input: [0.5, 0.2, 0.11, 0.89, 0.3], expected: 2 }].forEach(
({ input, expected }) =>
it(`should return ${expected} for [${input}]`, () => {
expect(sum(input)).toEqual(expected);
})
);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Decimal numbers in most programming languages (including JS) are internally represented in "floating point number" format. Floating point arithmetic is not exact. For example, the result of 46.5678 - 46 === 0.5678 is false because 46.5678 - 46 only yield a value that is very close to 0.5678. Even changing the order in which the program add/subtract numbers can yield different values.

So the following could happen

  expect( 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 ).toEqual( 1.805 );                // This fail
  expect( 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 ).toEqual( 1.8049999999999997 );   // This pass
  expect( 0.005 + 0.6 + 1.2 ).toEqual( 1.8049999999999997 );   // This fail

  console.log(1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 == 1.805);  // false
  console.log(1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 == 0.005 + 0.6 + 1.2); // false

Can you find a more appropriate way to test a value (that involves decimal number calculations) for equality?

Suggestion: Look up

  • Checking equality in floating point arithmetic in JavaScript
  • Checking equality in floating point arithmetic with Jest

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this. I have read about the matchers for numbers and floats now

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any change made to the relevant Jest test.

// Then it should ignore the non-numerical values and return the sum of the numerical elements

[
{ input: ["evan", 3, "mike", 20, 6, "", "/", , , 20], expected: 49 },
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to explicitly specify undefined instead of leaving the element blank.

@cjyuan cjyuan added Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take. and removed Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. labels Mar 19, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan March 28, 2026 05:32
@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan March 28, 2026 15:06
@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan April 3, 2026 10:57
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Apr 3, 2026
@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Apr 3, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan April 3, 2026 17:03
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Apr 3, 2026
Comment on lines +30 to +31
expect(dedupe(input)).toStrictEqual(expected);
expect(dedupe(input)).not.toBe(expected);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the purpose of the test on line 31? It will always pass.

@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Apr 3, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan April 5, 2026 10:33
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Apr 5, 2026
@cjyuan cjyuan added Complete Volunteer to add when work is complete and all review comments have been addressed. and removed Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take. Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. labels Apr 5, 2026
@cjyuan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cjyuan commented Apr 5, 2026

Looks good.

@Ofonimeedak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you, Sir. It's been a long journey....... I am learning well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Complete Volunteer to add when work is complete and all review comments have been addressed. Module-Data-Groups The name of the module. 📅 Sprint 1 Assigned during Sprint 1 of this module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants