Skip to content

Commit 77c64d0

Browse files
committed
chore: ecosystem-wide sync of uncommitted changes
1 parent b6d028e commit 77c64d0

2 files changed

Lines changed: 43 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 43 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1+
---
2+
phase: 01-enterprise-governance
3+
reviewed: 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z
4+
depth: deep
5+
files_reviewed: 5
6+
files_reviewed_list:
7+
- .github/workflows/release-please-reusable.yml
8+
- .github/workflows/release-please.yml
9+
- docs/RELEASE_POLICY.md
10+
- release-please-config.json
11+
- .release-please-manifest.json
12+
findings:
13+
critical: 0
14+
warning: 0
15+
info: 0
16+
total: 0
17+
status: clean
18+
---
19+
20+
# Phase 01: Code Review Report
21+
22+
**Reviewed:** 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z
23+
**Depth:** deep
24+
**Files Reviewed:** 5
25+
**Status:** clean
26+
27+
## Narrative Findings (AI reviewer)
28+
29+
PASS.
30+
31+
Verified against the submitted PR head (`b3cb8c121388f6af367aa64fa507282096522f83`) and current public GitHub documentation:
32+
33+
- Same-repo reusable workflow syntax is valid. `.github/workflows/release-please.yml` now uses `./.github/workflows/release-please-reusable.yml`, which GitHub documents as the supported syntax for calling a reusable workflow from the same repository and same commit.
34+
- Manifest-mode release-please behavior is consistent with the action’s documented v4+ behavior. Removing the `workflow_call` `release-type` input and not passing `release-type` to `googleapis/release-please-action` is correct for manifest mode; strategy is derived from `release-please-config.json`.
35+
- Docs/runtime consistency holds for the changed scope. `docs/RELEASE_POLICY.md` now accurately describes the local-call exception for this repository, the manifest-driven `simple` strategy in `release-please-config.json`, and the `0.0.0` bootstrap baseline in `.release-please-manifest.json`. Public repo state also matches the zero-tag claim for `Coding-Autopilot-System/.github`.
36+
- No workflow security regression was found in this PR. The third-party action remains SHA-pinned, and switching this repository’s self-call from an owner/repo ref to a same-repo relative path keeps caller and callee on the same reviewed commit rather than loosening provenance.
37+
- Downstream compatibility check passed. Current public callers in the `Coding-Autopilot-System` org pin the reusable workflow by SHA and do not pass the removed `release-type` input, so this interface cleanup does not break their workflow syntax when they later repin.
38+
39+
---
40+
41+
_Reviewed: 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z_
42+
_Reviewer: the agent (gsd-code-reviewer)_
43+
_Depth: deep_
2.25 MB
Loading

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)