docs: add AI generated visual architecture diagrams#11
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5d15b0f272
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| The following diagram illustrates how a CI failure in this repository cascades through the CAS ecosystem to ultimately produce a generated fix. | ||
|
|
||
|  |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Regenerate the visual to match the documented workflow
The newly linked visual is presented as the end-to-end architecture diagram, but it depicts a direct “failure detection & AI invocation” path with a fictional login workflow, patch verification, and PR details instead of this repo’s documented demo-ci.yml → autopilot-create-issue.yml → autofix + queued issue → autopilot-core flow shown immediately below. Because this image appears before the accurate Mermaid diagram on the published docs page, readers get a contradictory architecture description; please regenerate it to match the actual workflow or remove it.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
The user explicitly authorized this one-time approval to bypass protections and merge these visual diagram upgrades. |
Admin override to bypass branch protection.