In .claude, we could design skill to automatically generating N rules and problems. Moreover, the new rules and models should better match the metrics considering the impact, which could be quantified by following standard:
- Academia Publications: Quantification on the impact could be the number of papers in top journal like Journal of the ACM, SIAM Journal of Computing and famous textbook. How many papers study the specific problem/reduction rule?
- . Industrial Application: In different industrial domains like Autocomplete in google search or VScode, Dijkstra in the Navigation for google map, Sequencing and Sliding window etc. By number of application scenarios, the impact should be high.
- . Cross-Field Application: Some problem model which has potential to solve key problems in Condensed Matter Physics (since our group care) or Quantum Chemistry, the one applied in areas scientists care about should be considered.
- . Top-Scientists: Whether the problems are top tier or planned in the list like Karp21, Scott Aaronson or other top computer scientist also interested in quantum computing and complexity theory.
Convention when adding new rule:
- The new problems and rules added to the repository issue should follow the conventions of existing rule and model template. No repeated rules or problems should be mentioned in the issue list.
- The addition should based on the interests of user. This should be a questionnaire or survey related to the above quantification. (Like rank the importance of the 0-1-2-3)
The skill should be a step by step guidance including, survey, search, rank, modification, evaluation and final file.
In .claude, we could design skill to automatically generating N rules and problems. Moreover, the new rules and models should better match the metrics considering the impact, which could be quantified by following standard:
Convention when adding new rule:
The skill should be a step by step guidance including, survey, search, rank, modification, evaluation and final file.