Skip to content

Commit 9265fed

Browse files
committed
Add figures and submission information for PLOS ONE manuscript
- Added Fig1.tif to Fig7.tif in the figures_tif directory. - Created plosone_submission_info.md with detailed submission guidelines and requirements for the manuscript.
1 parent 1411b89 commit 9265fed

17 files changed

Lines changed: 39644 additions & 0 deletions
57.1 KB
Binary file not shown.
Lines changed: 71 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
1+
% See http://texblog.org/2013/11/11/latexs-alternative-letter-class-newlfm/
2+
% and http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/newlfm
3+
% for more information.
4+
%
5+
\documentclass[11pt,stdletter,orderfromtodate,sigleft]{newlfm}
6+
\usepackage{blindtext, xfrac, animate, hyperref, pxfonts}
7+
8+
\setlength{\voffset}{-0.45in}
9+
10+
\newlfmP{dateskipbefore=0pt}
11+
\newlfmP{sigsize=14pt}
12+
\newlfmP{sigskipbefore=6pt}
13+
14+
\newlfmP{Headlinewd=0pt,Footlinewd=0pt}
15+
16+
\namefrom{\vspace{-0.3in}Jeremy R. Manning}
17+
\addrfrom{
18+
Dartmouth College\\
19+
Department of Psychological \& Brain Sciences\\
20+
HB 6207 Moore Hall\\
21+
Hanover, NH 03755}
22+
23+
\addrto{}
24+
\dateset{\today}
25+
26+
\greetto{To the editors of \textit{PLOS ONE}:}
27+
28+
29+
30+
\closeline{Sincerely,}
31+
32+
\begin{document}
33+
\begin{newlfm}
34+
35+
I have enclosed our manuscript entitled \textit{A Stylometric Application of
36+
Large Language Models} to be considered for publication as a \textit{Research
37+
Article}. The manuscript shows that large language models can be used to
38+
distinguish the writings of different authors: an individual GPT-2 model,
39+
trained from scratch on the works of a single author, predicts that author's
40+
held-out text more accurately than text written by others.
41+
42+
Our central claim is supported by a systematic and fully reproducible set of
43+
experiments. We trained individual models on the works of eight classic authors
44+
and used cross-entropy loss as a measure of stylistic similarity, an approach we
45+
term predictive comparison. To confirm that our findings are robust rather than
46+
artifacts of a single training run, we trained models across multiple random
47+
seeds and several text representations (full text, content words, function
48+
words, and part-of-speech sequences). These ablations show that both content
49+
words and function words contribute to author-specific signatures, whereas
50+
grammatical structure alone is less distinctive. We further apply the approach
51+
to a real attribution problem, supporting R. P. Thompson's authorship of the
52+
well-studied 15\textsuperscript{th} book of the \textit{Oz} series, originally
53+
attributed to L. F. Baum.
54+
55+
We designed the study with reproducibility as a priority, in keeping with the
56+
standards of \textit{PLOS ONE}: all code and data needed to reproduce every
57+
result, figure, and statistical test are openly available at
58+
\url{https://github.com/ContextLab/llm-stylometry}. We believe the work will
59+
interest the journal's broad, interdisciplinary readership, including
60+
researchers in computational linguistics, digital humanities, and machine
61+
learning.
62+
63+
This manuscript reports original primary research that is not under
64+
consideration for publication elsewhere. An earlier version has been posted as a
65+
preprint on arXiv (arXiv:2510.21958), consistent with \textit{PLOS ONE}'s
66+
preprint policy. Thank you for considering our manuscript; I hope you will find
67+
it suitable for publication in \textit{PLOS ONE}.
68+
69+
70+
\end{newlfm}
71+
\end{document}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)