MPDX-9648, MPDX-9649 Savings fund transfer & MPGA UAT

[kegrimes]

Description

Jira ticket: MPDX-9648

• Round CSV values to nearest hundredth place

Jira ticket: MPDX-9649

• Change all "Stop Date" occurrences to "End Date" in Savings Fund Transfer

Testing

MPGA test:

• Impersonate: brian.funkhouser@cru.org
• Go to /reports/mpgaIncomeExpenses
• Download the MPGA income table
• Verify all values are rounded to the nearest hundredth place

Savings Fund Transfer test:

• Impersonate: veronika.bailey@cru.org
• Go to /hrTools/staffSavingFund/transfers
• Verify Transfer History table has "End Date" as column header
• Download transfer history csv file
• Check that column header says "End Date"

Checklist:

• I have given my PR a title with the format "MPDX-(JIRA#) (summary sentence max 80 chars)"
• I have applied the appropriate labels (Add the label "Preview" to automatically create a preview environment)
• I have run the Claude Code /pr-review command locally and fixed any relevant suggestions
• I have requested a review from another person on the project
• I have tested my changes in preview or in staging
• I have cleaned up my commit history

[github-actions]

Preview branch generated at https://MPDX-9648-fix-mpga-rounding.d3dytjb8adxkk5.amplifyapp.com

[github-actions]

Bundle sizes [mpdx-react]

Compared against 01f7baf

No significant changes found

[kegrimes]

🤖 Multi-Agent Code Review — Quick Mode ✅ Approve

Agents: 🧪 Testing · 👤 UX · 📋 Standards · Risk: 🟢 LOW · 10 files (+64 / −25)

Two logical changes: (1) label rename "Stop Date" → "End Date" across SavingsFundTransfer/**, and (2) a round()-to-2-decimals helper added to the MPGA CSV export (with a new test).

Verdict: ✅ Approve / safe to merge — no real blockers.

---

🚫 Critical Blockers

None.

⚠️ Flagged by agents but cleared on verification

"Missing translation keys will break the UI" → false positive.
src/lib/i18n.ts is configured with keySeparator: false, nsSeparator: false, and no saveMissing/missing-key handler. i18next therefore returns the key itself when a translation is absent — and in MPDX the English string is the key. So t('End date updated successfully') renders correctly for English users; there is no runtime breakage. The only minor follow-ups (non-blocking): non-English locales fall back to English until CrowdIn refreshes (normal yarn extract pipeline), and 3 orphaned Stop date… entries remain in public/locales/en/translation.json (pruned by yarn extract).

"CSV rounding may mismatch the on-screen report" → resolved by this PR.
On-screen tables already format via amountFormat/zeroAmountFormat (Intl, 2 decimals). The CSV export was the outlier emitting raw floats — this PR brings the download into line with the display. This is the fix.

💡 Optional, non-blocking suggestions

• Rounding edge cases — CustomExport.tsx:5. The new test covers round-down/round-up/average/total but not negatives or an exact half-cent (x.xx5) boundary; worth one extra assertion if expense reports can go negative.
• Aggregate-vs-rounded (verified correct) — CustomExport.tsx:34-42 sums raw values and rounds only at the createTable boundary. Rounded monthly columns may therefore not sum exactly to the rounded total (≤1¢ drift) — the standard, acceptable display-boundary tradeoff.

✅ What's solid

• Rename is complete and consistent across source + tests (column headers, IconButton titles, snackbar success/error messages, intro help text, CSV/print/download headers). No leftover user-facing "Stop Date" strings.
• New rounding logic is tested; existing tests updated in lockstep.
• All strings stay wrapped in t(); no hardcoded text, no interpolation-in-t(), no dynamic keys.
• Standards clean: named exports, no any/@ts-ignore/non-null assertions, no console.log/new Date(), accessible names preserved, financial rounding at the display boundary.

Agent	Critical	Important	Suggestions	After verification
🧪 Testing	0	0	2	clean
👤 UX	1	2	—	1 false-positive, 1 resolved-by-PR
📋 Standards	1	0	—	1 false-positive

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code — multi-agent review (quick mode)

[zweatshirt]

This is great! Just a quick suggestion, feel free to dismiss and readd me for review if needed :)

[zweatshirt]

Not sure why, impersonating Brian in the preview environment, the report itself is for Mickey and Minnie. Super odd. Did you run into this issue?

[kegrimes]

@zweatshirt Keely might be creating the helpducks article for these reports. I know she needed the test account to display Mickey and Minnie data so she isn't screenshotting real data!

[zweatshirt]

Looks great! Sorry for the delay. Would we be able to get the test coverage up before merging?

[kegrimes]

@zweatshirt I think the project coverage is what matters most and it seems like the percentage did not drop! I think we should be good to merge as is.