Middle-end: Do not model address cost for SELECT_VL style vectorization

Follow Richard's suggestions, we should not model address cost in the loop
vectorizer for select_vl or decrement IV since other style vectorization doesn't
do that.

To make cost model comparison apple to apple.
This patch set COST from 2 to 1 which turns out have better codegen
in various codegen for RVV.

Ok for trunk ?

	PR target/111153

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters):
	Remove address cost for select_vl/decrement IV.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153.c: Moved to...
	* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr11153-2.c: ...here.
	* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153-1.c: New test.

Author: zhongjuzhe

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153-1.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3 -ftree-vectorize -mtune=generic-ooo -ffast-math" } */
+
+#define DEF_REDUC_PLUS(TYPE)                                                   \
+  TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))                                     \
+  reduc_plus_##TYPE (TYPE *__restrict a, int n)                                \
+  {                                                                            \
+    TYPE r = 0;                                                                \
+    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)                                                \
+      r += a[i];                                                               \
+    return r;                                                                  \
+  }
+
+#define TEST_PLUS(T) T (int) T (float)
+
+TEST_PLUS (DEF_REDUC_PLUS)
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {vsetivli\s+zero,\s*4} } } */

…c.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153.c ….dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr11153-2.cgcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153.c renamed to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr11153-2.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr111153.c renamed to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr11153-2.c

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3 -ftree-vectorize -mtune=generic-ooo" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3 -ftree-vectorize -ffast-math" } */
 
 #define DEF_REDUC_PLUS(TYPE)                                                   \
   TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))                                     \
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
     return r;                                                                  \
   }
 
-#define TEST_PLUS(T) T (int)
+#define TEST_PLUS(T) T (int) T (float)
 
 TEST_PLUS (DEF_REDUC_PLUS)
 

gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc

@@ -4872,12 +4872,10 @@ vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
 
 	    unsigned int length_update_cost = 0;
 	    if (LOOP_VINFO_USING_DECREMENTING_IV_P (loop_vinfo))
-	      /* For decrement IV style, we use a single SELECT_VL since
-		 beginning to calculate the number of elements need to be
-		 processed in current iteration, and a SHIFT operation to
-		 compute the next memory address instead of adding vectorization
-		 factor.  */
-	      length_update_cost = 2;
+	      /* For decrement IV style, Each only need a single SELECT_VL
+		 or MIN since beginning to calculate the number of elements
+		 need to be processed in current iteration.  */
+	      length_update_cost = 1;
 	    else
 	      /* For increment IV stype, Each may need two MINs and one MINUS to
 		 update lengths in body for next iteration.  */