You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/RSdays/2026/Berlin/_index.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ The National High‑Performance Computing Initiative (NHR) offers free, large‑
84
84
The Berlin node—NHR@ZIB—resides at the Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB) and operates the LISE supercomputer. In this session we will present an overview of the NHR’s mission, governance and infrastructure, followed by a detailed look at the services available through NHR@ZIB. We will illustrate how HPC and AI are applied in natural and life sciences through concrete use‑case examples, highlighting the impact of high‑performance resources on research outcomes.
85
85
86
86
**(1.3) How to create better code for better research? Where Small Steps Make Big Differences in Software Quality and Workflow Quality**<br>*Robert Casties (MPIWG), Julia Damerow (Arizona State), Daniel Nüst (TU Dresden), Malte Vogl (MPI Geoanthropology)*
87
-
When in the research lifecycle do small interventions yield the largest gains in code, workflow, and research quality? This hands-on session explores that question by combining two complementary initiatives: CODECHECK (https://codecheck.org.uk/), which independently checks
88
-
computational workflows as part of peer review, and the DHTech Code Review Working Group (https://dhcodereview.github.io/), which provides collaborative code review for in-progress research software. After introducing both initiatives, we examine diverse perspectives on what
87
+
When in the research lifecycle do small interventions yield the largest gains in code, workflow, and research quality? This hands-on session explores that question by combining two complementary initiatives: CODECHECK https://codecheck.org.uk/, which independently checks
88
+
computational workflows as part of peer review, and the DHTech Code Review Working Group https://dhcodereview.github.io/, which provides collaborative code review for in-progress research software. After introducing both initiatives, we examine diverse perspectives on what
89
89
"good software/workflows" means in research contexts, discuss incentives and benefits, and identify practical, low-barrier quality improvements that individual researchers/developers as well as communities can adopt.
0 commit comments