Skip to content

Removed throw_stub_exception, not used anymore, use nullptr in some p…#2403

Merged
jwillemsen merged 2 commits into
DOCGroup:masterfrom
jwillemsen:jwi-throw_stub_exception
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

Removed throw_stub_exception, not used anymore, use nullptr in some p…#2403
jwillemsen merged 2 commits into
DOCGroup:masterfrom
jwillemsen:jwi-throw_stub_exception

Conversation

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jwillemsen jwillemsen commented Jun 13, 2025

…laces

* TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/HTIOP/HTIOP_Connector_Impl.h:
* TAO/tao/CDR.cpp:
* TAO/tao/CDR.h:
* TAO/tao/Connector_Impl.h:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Updated default values for pointer and boolean parameters in various constructors and methods to use modern C++ style (nullptr and false instead of 0).
    • Improved code readability and consistency in method signatures and comments.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unused exception handling methods related to error code mapping in data stream classes.

…laces

    * TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/HTIOP/HTIOP_Connector_Impl.h:
    * TAO/tao/CDR.cpp:
    * TAO/tao/CDR.h:
    * TAO/tao/Connector_Impl.h:
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update default pointer and boolean parameter values in several constructors and methods from legacy zero literals (0) to modern C++ style (nullptr and false). Additionally, static exception-throwing methods are removed from two CDR classes, and related declarations are eliminated. Some minor formatting adjustments to method signatures and comments are also included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/HTIOP/HTIOP_Connector_Impl.h Updated Connect_Creation_Strategy constructor defaults from 0 to nullptr and false for pointers/bools.
TAO/tao/Connector_Impl.h Updated TAO_Connect_Creation_Strategy constructor defaults from 0 to nullptr for pointer parameters.
TAO/tao/CDR.cpp Removed throw_stub_exception methods from TAO_OutputCDR and TAO_InputCDR classes.
TAO/tao/CDR.h Removed throw_stub_exception declarations; updated pointer defaults from 0 to nullptr; minor formatting.

Poem

In the code where zeros once would dwell,
Now nullptr and false ring the bell.
Old exception throwers take their leave,
Modern C++ we now achieve!
With cleaner code, the rabbits cheer—
For clarity and style are here!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d5a32c and 5b1bfbb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • TAO/tao/CDR.h (10 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • TAO/tao/CDR.h
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug32
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Release64
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-13
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-10 CORBA/e compact
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 clang++-13
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 clang++-16
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-10 CodeQL
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-9
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-14
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 clang++-15
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-10 CORBA/e micro
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-12
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-10 wchar
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-10 ACE for TAO
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 clang++-14
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-11
  • GitHub Check: alpine-3.18
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-12
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++
  • GitHub Check: windows-2022 vs2022
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch jwi-throw_stub_exception
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
TAO/tao/CDR.h (1)

355-410: Mixed use of 0 vs. nullptr – please unify for readability

Within the same TAO_InputCDR class, some constructors now use nullptr (👍 lines 355, 365, 374, 401-405, 408-410) while the earlier ones (e.g. lines 326-340 & 343-346, unchanged in this diff) still default to literal 0.

Keeping two styles side-by-side hampers grep-ability and invites accidental re-introductions of 0 elsewhere. Recommend converting the remaining pointer defaults as well (and, ideally, doing the same pass for the TAO_OutputCDR constructors that still use 0).

Example patch for the first two untouched ctors:

- TAO_InputCDR (const char* buf,
-               size_t bufsiz,
-               int byte_order = ACE_CDR_BYTE_ORDER,
-               ACE_CDR::Octet major_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MAJOR,
-               ACE_CDR::Octet minor_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MINOR,
-               TAO_ORB_Core* orb_core = 0);
+ TAO_InputCDR (const char* buf,
+               size_t bufsiz,
+               int byte_order = ACE_CDR_BYTE_ORDER,
+               ACE_CDR::Octet major_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MAJOR,
+               ACE_CDR::Octet minor_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MINOR,
+               TAO_ORB_Core* orb_core = nullptr);

- TAO_InputCDR (size_t bufsiz,
-               int byte_order = ACE_CDR_BYTE_ORDER,
-               ACE_CDR::Octet major_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MAJOR,
-               ACE_CDR::Octet minor_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MINOR,
-               TAO_ORB_Core* orb_core = 0);
+ TAO_InputCDR (size_t bufsiz,
+               int byte_order = ACE_CDR_BYTE_ORDER,
+               ACE_CDR::Octet major_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MAJOR,
+               ACE_CDR::Octet minor_version = TAO_DEF_GIOP_MINOR,
+               TAO_ORB_Core* orb_core = nullptr);

Applying the same pattern throughout keeps the header internally consistent and future-proof.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59cdd1a and 7d5a32c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/HTIOP/HTIOP_Connector_Impl.h (1 hunks)
  • TAO/tao/CDR.cpp (0 hunks)
  • TAO/tao/CDR.h (6 hunks)
  • TAO/tao/Connector_Impl.h (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • TAO/tao/CDR.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (21)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 clang++-14
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-13
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-9
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-11
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 g++-12
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug64Cxx20
  • GitHub Check: VS2022WChar
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug32
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug64Cxx17
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Release64
  • GitHub Check: VS2022WChar
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug64
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Release32
  • GitHub Check: MINGW64-gcc
  • GitHub Check: alpine-3.18
  • GitHub Check: macos-13-C++
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-12
  • GitHub Check: macos-14-C++
  • GitHub Check: windows-2022 vs2022
🔇 Additional comments (3)
TAO/tao/Connector_Impl.h (1)

48-49: Consistent use of nullptr is a welcome modernization

Switching the default pointer arguments from the legacy literal 0 to the C++11‐style nullptr improves clarity and removes implicit integer-to-pointer conversions. No other issues spotted here.

TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/HTIOP/HTIOP_Connector_Impl.h (1)

55-58: Good move to explicit nullptr / false defaults

The updated defaults remove the old “magic zero” idiom for both pointers and boolean flags, making call-sites less error-prone. Looks correct and fully backwards compatible.

TAO/tao/CDR.h (1)

421-421: Minor nit – function signature wrap

clr_mb_flags() is now on a single line; no behavioural change, and the compact form improves readability.

    * TAO/tao/CDR.h:
@jwillemsen jwillemsen merged commit f18aa97 into DOCGroup:master Jun 13, 2025
36 checks passed
@jwillemsen jwillemsen deleted the jwi-throw_stub_exception branch June 13, 2025 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant