Skip to content

Fix the omnibus.build-repackaged-agent task#52887

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
ofek/fix-repackage-task
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

Fix the omnibus.build-repackaged-agent task#52887
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
ofek/fix-repackage-task

Conversation

@ofek

@ofek ofek commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

When one has permission to write to /opt/datadog-agent/ but not /opt/, like the new dd user in our developer environments, the task fails:

❯ dda inv -- -e omnibus.build-repackaged-agent
The Agent installation directory /opt/datadog-agent already exists, and will be overwritten by this build. Continue? [y/N] y
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/__main__.py", line 3, in <module>
    program.run()
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/program.py", line 398, in run
    self.execute()
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/program.py", line 583, in execute
    executor.execute(*self.tasks)
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/executor.py", line 140, in execute
    result = call.task(*args, **call.kwargs)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/repos/datadog-agent/tasks/custom_task/custom_task.py", line 149, in custom__call__
    result = self.body(*args, **kwargs)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/repos/datadog-agent/tasks/omnibus.py", line 467, in build_repackaged_agent
    shutil.rmtree("/opt/datadog-agent")
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 796, in rmtree
    onexc(os.rmdir, path, err)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 794, in rmtree
    os.rmdir(path, dir_fd=dir_fd)
PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/datadog-agent'

@ofek
ofek requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2026 22:44
@ofek ofek added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Jun 26, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-build labels Jun 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jun 26, 2026

@aiuto aiuto left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does anyone actually use this?
It's not called from gitlab.

If this is related to the "hacky agent build" then it is on my list for removing this quarter.
That aside, this seems fine.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 60f210fe:

Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.197.f270200.pipeline.125426322-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 60f210f
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

33 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 750.056 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 704.965 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 307.921 MiB
agent_msi 643.924 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 750.040 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 704.949 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 726.648 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 685.238 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 750.040 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 704.949 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 726.648 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 685.238 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 808.759 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 810.375 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 999.656 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 989.925 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 209.791 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.889 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.223 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.367 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 303.101 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 314.592 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.960 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.003 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.960 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.960 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 46.109 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.805 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.573 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 46.110 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 46.109 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 33045a82-a143-496c-8dd9-702dff6a1009

Baseline: 1241668
Comparison: 643d479
Diff

❌ Experiments with retried target crashes

This is a critical error. One or more replicates failed with a non-zero exit code. These replicates may have been retried. See Replicate Execution Details for more information.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features

Optimization Goals: ✅ Improvement(s) detected

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -6.50 [-6.73, -6.27] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -40.61 [-41.39, -39.83] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -2.52 [-2.61, -2.43] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization -3.21 [-3.30, -3.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization -3.43 [-3.47, -3.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization -3.48 [-3.53, -3.42] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -4.07 [-4.13, -4.02] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -6.50 [-6.73, -6.27] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -40.61 [-41.39, -39.83] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 147.50MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 729.68KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 493.50MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 183.34MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.16MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 346.59 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 404.07MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 29.33 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 298.83MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 63.40 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 275.36MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 23.04 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 281.50MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Normal Replicate Execution Failures (non-profiling)

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 0 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 0, 4 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@ofek

ofek commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

If this is related to the "hacky agent build"

It's an equivalent concept but for package distributions rather than container images.

@ofek

ofek commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-06-27 19:22:40 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-06-27 19:22:44 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 4h (p90).


2026-06-27 19:45:30 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Retrying because an high priority merge request needed to be processed first. No action is needed from your side.


2026-06-27 19:45:32 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request build was cancelled

ofek.lev@datadoghq.com cancelled this merge request build

@ofek

ofek commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge -c

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-06-27 19:45:24 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge -c

Comment thread tasks/omnibus.py Outdated
"build",
"agent",
base_dir=None,
base_dir=_resolve_omnibus_path_override(None, "OMNIBUS_BASE_DIR"),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The initial issue was fixed but then I had to add this because another error occurred further along the build:

cd omnibus && bundle exec omnibus build agent --log-level=info --override=cache_dir:/var/cache/dd/omnibus/cache
                    [CLI] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Using config from 'omnibus.rb'
[2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00] INFO: The plugin path /etc/chef/ohai/plugins does not exist. Skipping...
Building agent 7.0.0-devel...
[Software: existing-agent-package] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Resolving manifest entry for existing-agent-package
[Software: init-scripts-agent] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Resolving manifest entry for init-scripts-agent
[NullFetcher: init-scripts-agent] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Fetching `init-scripts-agent' (nothing to fetch)
[Software: datadog-agent] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Resolving manifest entry for datadog-agent
[Software: datadog-agent-installer-symlinks] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Resolving manifest entry for datadog-agent-installer-symlinks
[NullFetcher: datadog-agent-installer-symlinks] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Fetching `datadog-agent-installer-symlinks' (nothing to fetch)
[PathFetcher: datadog-agent] I | 2026-06-27T19:28:39+00:00 | Copying from `..'
#<Thread:0x00005775ba9b7e68 /opt/dd/rvm/gems/ruby-2.7.2/bundler/gems/omnibus-ruby-5b00eeae9fa5/lib/omnibus/thread_pool.rb:56 run> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true):
/opt/dd/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.7.2/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:250:in `mkdir': Permission denied @ dir_s_mkdir - /var/cache/omnibus (Errno::EACCES)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Jun 27, 2026
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Comment thread tasks/libs/common/omnibus.py Outdated
'INTEGRATION_WHEELS_SKIP_CACHE_UPLOAD': 'Setting that skips uploading integration wheels to cache',
'MY_RUBY_HOME': 'rvm / Ruby stuff to make sure Omnibus itself runs correctly',
'OMNIBUS_FORCE_PACKAGES': 'Force Omnibus to build actual packages',
'OMNIBUS_BASE_DIR': 'Base directory used by Omnibus for build state and staged filesystem roots',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The second issue was fixed but then I had to copy the pattern used here due to another issue:

INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/packages/agent/linux/install <args omitted>
INFO: Installing to /
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/_install_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 541, in <module>
    main()
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/_install_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 535, in main
    _run_py_path(main_filename, args=sys.argv[1:])
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/_install_stage2_bootstrap.py", line 323, in _run_py_path
    runpy.run_path(main_filename, run_name="__main__")
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 287, in run_path
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 98, in _run_module_code
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/install_install_script.py", line 292, in <module>
    sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/install_install_script.py", line 288, in main
    installer.do_the_thing()
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/install_install_script.py", line 205, in do_the_thing
    self._install_directory(entry)
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/install_install_script.py", line 132, in _install_directory
    self._do_mkdir(entry.dest, entry.mode)
  File "/var/cache/dd/bazel/_bazel_dd/b7941ad420175bb062a7773daa329dcd/execroot/_main/bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/packages/agent/linux/install.runfiles/_main/packages/agent/linux/install_install_script.py", line 98, in _do_mkdir
    os.makedirs(dirname, int(mode, 8), exist_ok=True)
  File "<frozen os>", line 225, in makedirs
PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/datadog-packages'

@ofek
ofek marked this pull request as draft June 27, 2026 20:44
@datadog-prod-us1-4

This comment has been minimized.

@ofek

ofek commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-06 04:36:12 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on


2026-07-06 04:37:20 UTC ℹ️ Gitlab pipeline started

Started pipeline #122828810

@ofek
ofek force-pushed the ofek/fix-repackage-task branch from b49c3d8 to b31e0cc Compare July 14, 2026 21:57
@ofek
ofek marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 13:19

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b31e0cc291

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread omnibus/lib/project_extension.rb Outdated
@ofek
ofek force-pushed the ofek/fix-repackage-task branch 2 times, most recently from 151935b to f920855 Compare July 15, 2026 23:39
@ofek
ofek force-pushed the ofek/fix-repackage-task branch from 850398d to 2662cc9 Compare July 17, 2026 07:48

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2662cc93ca

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread omnibus/config/software/existing-agent-package.rb Outdated
@ofek

ofek commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-18 02:26:41 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-18 02:26:47 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).


2026-07-18 03:15:20 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 643d479 into main Jul 18, 2026
505 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the ofek/fix-repackage-task branch July 18, 2026 03:15
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.83.0 milestone Jul 18, 2026
github-actions Bot pushed a commit to Bettdatt/datadog-agent that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2026
### Motivation

When one has permission to write to `/opt/datadog-agent/` but not `/opt/`, like the new `dd` user in our developer environments, the task fails:

```
❯ dda inv -- -e omnibus.build-repackaged-agent
The Agent installation directory /opt/datadog-agent already exists, and will be overwritten by this build. Continue? [y/N] y
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/__main__.py", line 3, in <module>
    program.run()
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/program.py", line 398, in run
    self.execute()
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/program.py", line 583, in execute
    executor.execute(*self.tasks)
  File "/var/lib/dd/dda/venvs/legacy/lib/python3.12/site-packages/invoke/executor.py", line 140, in execute
    result = call.task(*args, **call.kwargs)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/repos/datadog-agent/tasks/custom_task/custom_task.py", line 149, in custom__call__
    result = self.body(*args, **kwargs)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/repos/datadog-agent/tasks/omnibus.py", line 467, in build_repackaged_agent
    shutil.rmtree("/opt/datadog-agent")
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 796, in rmtree
    onexc(os.rmdir, path, err)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 794, in rmtree
    os.rmdir(path, dir_fd=dir_fd)
PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/datadog-agent'
```

Co-authored-by: ofek.lev <ofek.lev@datadoghq.com> 643d479
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants