Skip to content

Have one and only one \n character at the end of the system-probe.yaml #49885

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
stanp/4-Add_back_newline_character_at_system-probe-yaml_end
Apr 28, 2026
Merged

Have one and only one \n character at the end of the system-probe.yaml #49885
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
stanp/4-Add_back_newline_character_at_system-probe-yaml_end

Conversation

@Stanislas167
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Recent change corrected the missing tailing \n in the system-probe.yaml and another removed it by mistake.

This missing \n shouldn't have execution impact since it doesn't prevent the yaml parsing.

However, this caused the agent_linux_install_script’s unit test to fail, as the script checks for the configuration by ensuring it is POSIX-compliant which expect a tailing \n

@Stanislas167 Stanislas167 self-assigned this Apr 24, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Apr 24, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Apr 24, 2026
@Stanislas167 Stanislas167 added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Apr 24, 2026
@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 8078bf48:

Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.205.90a4688b.pipeline.109816180-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: e3727cf7-b0a6-4826-a2a3-21414d57e4f9

Baseline: 15b1c1c
Comparison: bcafe99
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.10 [-1.83, +4.03] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.31 [+0.34, +2.28] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.10 [-1.83, +4.03] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.54 [+0.39, +0.69] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.44 [+0.20, +0.68] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.25 [+0.21, +0.30] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.20 [+0.10, +0.30] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization +0.17 [+0.10, +0.24] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.16 [-0.03, +0.35] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.07 [-0.36, +0.50] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.47, +0.60] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.38, +0.43] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.02 [-0.13, +0.18] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.20, +0.20] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.13, +0.13] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.20, +0.19] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.03 [-0.07, +0.01] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.15 [-0.20, -0.10] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.25 [-0.44, -0.06] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.26 [-0.38, -0.15] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.42 [-0.46, -0.37] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -0.67 [-0.92, -0.41] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -1.34 [-1.54, -1.15] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 699 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 243.61MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 714 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 141.35MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 467.13MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 174.88MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 353.24 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 375.37MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@Stanislas167 Stanislas167 marked this pull request as ready for review April 28, 2026 09:09
@Stanislas167 Stanislas167 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 28, 2026 09:09
@Stanislas167 Stanislas167 requested a review from dustmop April 28, 2026 09:09
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit bcafe99 into main Apr 28, 2026
273 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the stanp/4-Add_back_newline_character_at_system-probe-yaml_end branch April 28, 2026 16:45
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.80.0 milestone Apr 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-configuration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants