Skip to content

[NTWK-799] Allow custom namespaces on Synthetics to enable NDM resolution#53700

Draft
ken-schneider wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
ken/ntwk-799-synthetics-netpath-namespace
Draft

[NTWK-799] Allow custom namespaces on Synthetics to enable NDM resolution#53700
ken-schneider wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
ken/ntwk-799-synthetics-netpath-namespace

Conversation

@ken-schneider

@ken-schneider ken-schneider commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

This PR modifies the Synthetics Collector to:

  • Send NDM namespace on Network Path tests by default (in line with the Network Path integration)
  • Allows the back end to send namespace as part of a test config and have that namespace propagate to the Network Path backend. UI changes would be required for this path to be used.

Motivation

NTWK-799, a customer reported that NDM devices aren't showing in their Network Paths, upon investigation these were Agent based Synthetic tests and the devices in question have a specific namespace that they're a part of.

Today, the Synthetics runner never reads the namespace from anywhere. This change will put it in line with other Network Path tests and the customer should in the short-medium term just set this in the YAML until the changes can be implemented on the Synthetics UI.

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Jul 15, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Jul 15, 2026
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 87.50%
Overall Coverage: 51.89% (+0.14%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: b2c92e9 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@ken-schneider ken-schneider added team/network-path qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests and removed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Jul 15, 2026
@ken-schneider
ken-schneider marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 20:42
@ken-schneider
ken-schneider requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2026 20:42
@ken-schneider
ken-schneider marked this pull request as draft July 15, 2026 20:42
@github-actions github-actions Bot deleted a comment from chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Jul 15, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 282c2e68:

Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.140.b2c92e9.pipeline.125384207-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 282c2e6
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +96.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -1.30% of buffer) 750.975 → 751.069 → 758.200
agent_deb_amd64_fips +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.47% of buffer) 705.884 → 705.982 → 709.840
agent_heroku_amd64 +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.10% of buffer) 307.705 → 307.713 → 315.230
agent_msi +3.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.03% of buffer) 645.649 → 645.652 → 656.640
agent_rpm_amd64 +96.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -1.30% of buffer) 750.959 → 751.053 → 758.170
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.46% of buffer) 705.868 → 705.965 → 709.840
agent_rpm_arm64 +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.70% of buffer) 726.043 → 726.141 → 729.660
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.31% of buffer) 684.633 → 684.731 → 688.860
agent_suse_amd64 +96.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -1.30% of buffer) 750.959 → 751.053 → 758.170
agent_suse_amd64_fips +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.46% of buffer) 705.868 → 705.965 → 709.840
agent_suse_arm64 +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.70% of buffer) 726.043 → 726.141 → 729.660
agent_suse_arm64_fips +100.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.31% of buffer) 684.633 → 684.731 → 688.860
docker_agent_amd64 +96.15 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.29% of buffer) 809.682 → 809.776 → 813.790
docker_agent_arm64 +100.12 KiB (0.01% increase, -1.86% of buffer) 809.771 → 809.869 → 815.030
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +96.14 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.36% of buffer) 1000.580 → 1000.673 → 1004.550
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 +100.14 KiB (0.01% increase, -1.81% of buffer) 989.321 → 989.418 → 994.710
iot_agent_deb_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.10% of buffer) 46.194 → 46.198 → 46.380
iot_agent_deb_arm64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.47% of buffer) 42.882 → 42.886 → 43.720
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.11% of buffer) 46.195 → 46.199 → 46.380
iot_agent_suse_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase, -2.10% of buffer) 46.194 → 46.198 → 46.380
13 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 209.881 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.952 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.216 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.367 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 303.100 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 314.592 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.951 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 27.994 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.951 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.951 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.647 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 8281ce9f-f67d-4fba-8fc3-a490b8eb225e

Baseline: 282c2e6
Comparison: b2c92e9
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +2.08 [+1.83, +2.34] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization +0.16 [+0.07, +0.26] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization +0.05 [+0.01, +0.09] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization -0.01 [-0.07, +0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.33 [-0.39, -0.28] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.42 [-0.50, -0.33] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.65 [-3.61, -1.69] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 145.91MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 730.84KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 9/10 497.38MiB > 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 179.86MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 263.76MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 400.03 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 408.81MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 31.91 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 300.03MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 62.14 ≤ 80 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 276.85MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 23.58 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 282.80MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.

  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@ken-schneider ken-schneider changed the title [NTWK-799] Allow custom namespaces to enable NDM resolution [NTWK-799] Allow custom namespaces on Synthetics to enable NDM resolution Jul 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time team/agent-build team/network-path

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant