Skip to content

[ACTP][fix] stop heartbeating on-prem tasks once the server reports the job is gone (NotFound)#53757

Open
asiya-sh wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
asiya-sh/par-heartbeat-notfound-stop
Open

[ACTP][fix] stop heartbeating on-prem tasks once the server reports the job is gone (NotFound)#53757
asiya-sh wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
asiya-sh/par-heartbeat-notfound-stop

Conversation

@asiya-sh

@asiya-sh asiya-sh commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

An on-prem private action runner keeps sending heartbeats for a task after it has completed and its record has been cleaned up remotely. The failure was indistinguishable from a transient error, so the runner retried forever — a single stuck runner produces a sustained heartbeat error rate.

The runner now recognizes the not-found response (HTTP 404) and stops its heartbeat loop for that task instead of retrying indefinitely.

  • Heartbeat maps a 404 response to a new ErrJobNotFound sentinel.
  • The workflow heartbeat loop exits on ErrJobNotFound.

Tests added for both paths.

@asiya-sh
asiya-sh requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2026 16:47
@asiya-sh
asiya-sh requested review from dd-gplassard and removed request for a team July 16, 2026 16:47
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/action-platform labels Jul 16, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Jul 16, 2026
@asiya-sh asiya-sh changed the title private-runner: stop heartbeating on-prem tasks once the server reports the job is gone (NotFound) [ACTP][fix] stop heartbeating on-prem tasks once the server reports the job is gone (NotFound) Jul 16, 2026
@asiya-sh
asiya-sh force-pushed the asiya-sh/par-heartbeat-notfound-stop branch from 602ff57 to ab6ef22 Compare July 16, 2026 16:57
@datadog-prod-us1-6

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 52.02% (+0.14%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: a596b9b | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 527742b
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +4.03 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.58% of buffer) 209.791 → 209.795 → 210.470
32 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 750.055 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 704.964 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 307.921 MiB
agent_msi 643.927 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 750.039 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 704.948 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 726.648 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 685.238 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 750.039 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 704.948 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 726.648 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 685.238 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 808.758 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 810.376 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 999.656 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 989.926 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.889 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.223 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.367 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 303.101 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 314.592 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.960 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.003 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.960 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.960 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 46.109 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.805 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.573 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 46.110 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 46.109 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 054ae3b7-e67a-4d21-9dbc-5a6f86ab508f

Baseline: 527742b
Comparison: a596b9b
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization +0.46 [+0.36, +0.55] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization +0.31 [+0.26, +0.36] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization +0.21 [+0.17, +0.25] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.06 [-0.02, +0.13] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.05 [-0.94, +1.04] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -0.20 [-0.45, +0.04] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.40 [-0.45, -0.35] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 145.37MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 734.63KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 491.49MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 187.13MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.14MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 362.89 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 407.31MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 30.36 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 299.78MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 61.96 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 277.50MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 25.95 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 282.36MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@asiya-sh
asiya-sh force-pushed the asiya-sh/par-heartbeat-notfound-stop branch from ab6ef22 to a596b9b Compare July 17, 2026 06:10
@asiya-sh
asiya-sh requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2026 06:10
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 527742bf:

Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.183.a596b9b.pipeline.125198650-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@asiya-sh asiya-sh added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Jul 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/action-platform team/agent-build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants