[sensitive data scanner] Change documentation and codeowners (#1853)

Co-authored-by: ci.datadog-api-spec <packages@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot] <54105614+api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]

.apigentools-info

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-01-30 19:41:20.102335",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "31c15660"
+            "regenerated": "2024-01-31 12:10:14.248647",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "52641937"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-01-30 19:41:20.119895",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "31c15660"
+            "regenerated": "2024-01-31 12:10:14.263477",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "52641937"
         }
     }
 }

.generator/schemas/v2/openapi.yaml

@@ -17240,7 +17240,7 @@ components:
           description: 'Keyword list that will be checked during scanning in order
             to validate a match.
 
-            The number of keywords in the list must be less than or equal to 20.'
+            The number of keywords in the list must be less than or equal to 30.'
           example:
           - credit card
           - cc

src/datadog_api_client/v2/model/sensitive_data_scanner_included_keyword_configuration.py

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ def __init__(self_, character_count: int, keywords: List[str], **kwargs):
         :type character_count: int
 
         :param keywords: Keyword list that will be checked during scanning in order to validate a match.
-            The number of keywords in the list must be less than or equal to 20.
+            The number of keywords in the list must be less than or equal to 30.
         :type keywords: [str]
         """
         super().__init__(kwargs)

tests/v2/features/sensitive_data_scanner.feature

@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And a valid "appKeyAuth" key in the system
     And an instance of "SensitiveDataScanner" API
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "CreateScanningGroup" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And new "CreateScanningGroup" request
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And the response "data.type" is equal to "sensitive_data_scanner_group"
     And the response "data.attributes.name" is equal to "{{ unique }}"
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -48,23 +48,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And the response "data.attributes.included_keyword_configuration.character_count" is equal to 35
     And the response "data.attributes.included_keyword_configuration.keywords[0]" is equal to "credit card"
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -74,23 +74,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List Scanning Groups returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "ListScanningGroups" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List Scanning Groups returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -116,19 +116,19 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     Then the response status is 200 OK
     And the response "included" has item with field "id" with value "{{ group.data.id }}"
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List standard patterns returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "ListStandardPatterns" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @integration-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @integration-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List standard patterns returns "OK" response
     Given new "ListStandardPatterns" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Reorder Groups returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @replay-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @replay-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Reorder Groups returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -146,23 +146,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -183,15 +183,15 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"excluded_namespaces": ["admin.name"], "included_keyword_configuration": {"character_count": 30, "keywords": ["credit card", "cc"]}, "namespaces": ["admin"], "tags": [], "text_replacement": {"type": "none"}}, "relationships": {"group": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}}, "standard_pattern": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_standard_pattern"}}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/logs-core
+  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system