Skip to content

Stop vendoring resx for vendored microsoft code#8461

Open
andrewlock wants to merge 1 commit intoandrew/update-vendors-3from
andrew/update-vendors-4
Open

Stop vendoring resx for vendored microsoft code#8461
andrewlock wants to merge 1 commit intoandrew/update-vendors-3from
andrew/update-vendors-4

Conversation

@andrewlock
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@andrewlock andrewlock commented Apr 15, 2026

Summary of changes

Stop vendoring the SR + regex files for microsoft code

Reason for change

Using ResourceManager is overkill, as we don't deploy all the translations etc anyway, and don't want to.

Implementation details

Replaced all the SR. accesses in previous PRs, so this is now dead code that we can remove.

Test coverage

If it builds, we're good

Other details

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMLP-1207

Note that currently, there's a lot of Utf8Formatter code that isn't used, and could be excluded, however, given that theoretically we could/should use this in the future. I'm torn whether to just leave it in, or whether to tear it out for now, and restore it if/when we want to use it later. Any thoughts?

Part of a stack updating our vendored system code

@andrewlock andrewlock added the type:cleanup Minor code clean up label Apr 15, 2026
@andrewlock andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners April 15, 2026 14:34
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:vendors Code from other vendors label Apr 15, 2026
@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-21 11:25:06

Comparing candidate commit 7dc44a2 in PR branch andrew/update-vendors-4 with baseline commit b821c57 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.020%; +0.032%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.949ms; -0.921ms] or [-0.968%; -0.457%]
  • ignore throughput [+534.838op/s; +1031.344op/s] or [+0.634%; +1.223%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2.189ms; +6.772ms] or [-1.092%; +3.379%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+6820.968op/s; +10254.785op/s] or [+5.733%; +8.620%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.104ms; +3.281ms] or [+0.555%; +1.650%]
  • ignore throughput [-181.558op/s; +929.995op/s] or [-0.185%; +0.946%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+8 bytes; +9 bytes] or [+0.266%; +0.279%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.680ms; +303.874ms] or [+149.208%; +150.793%]
  • ignore throughput [+17.205op/s; +20.845op/s] or [+3.096%; +3.750%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+381.749ms; +384.598ms] or [+301.605%; +303.856%]
  • ignore throughput [+15.253op/s; +18.371op/s] or [+2.011%; +2.422%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+399.772ms; +401.950ms] or [+353.783%; +355.711%]
  • ignore throughput [+3.841op/s; +6.257op/s] or [+0.543%; +0.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]
  • ignore execution_time [-823.201µs; -184.969µs] or [-0.411%; -0.092%]
  • ignore throughput [-4268.593op/s; -3903.487op/s] or [-3.321%; -3.037%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.906ms; -11.724ms] or [-7.429%; -5.476%]
  • ignore throughput [+3697.453op/s; +6514.980op/s] or [+2.699%; +4.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]
  • ignore execution_time [-12.046ms; -7.864ms] or [-5.736%; -3.745%]
  • ignore throughput [-1956.270op/s; +381.908op/s] or [-1.769%; +0.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • ignore execution_time [-993.507µs; -227.814µs] or [-0.495%; -0.113%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-256948.227op/s; -253542.586op/s] or [-26.236%; -25.888%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.004ms; -20.132ms] or [-11.151%; -8.978%]
  • ignore throughput [-61794.937op/s; -38815.854op/s] or [-6.602%; -4.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.180ms; +0.164ms] or [-2.087%; +0.082%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154498.557op/s; -137977.039op/s] or [-22.198%; -19.825%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-851.862µs; +187.257µs] or [-0.425%; +0.093%]
  • ignore throughput [-3472.582op/s; -2497.764op/s] or [-2.337%; -1.681%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.568ms; +2.947ms] or [-0.287%; +1.487%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8208.125op/s; +11126.927op/s] or [+5.223%; +7.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+2.317ms; +6.294ms] or [+1.181%; +3.209%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+6601.664op/s; +9239.554op/s] or [+5.259%; +7.361%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-314.691µs; -109.628µs] or [-0.157%; -0.055%]
  • ignore throughput [+28543.304op/s; +44452.724op/s] or [+0.868%; +1.352%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1182.481µs; +253.587µs] or [-0.585%; +0.125%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+338865.508op/s; +363153.582op/s] or [+11.299%; +12.109%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.301ms; -14.928ms] or [-8.897%; -6.881%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+180738.090op/s; +234347.405op/s] or [+7.174%; +9.302%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +4 bytes] or [+0.004%; +0.012%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.836ms; +300.333ms] or [+149.818%; +150.066%]
  • ignore throughput [+150.939op/s; +171.597op/s] or [+1.667%; +1.895%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.523ms; +302.656ms] or [+151.050%; +152.630%]
  • ignore throughput [+353.139op/s; +565.224op/s] or [+2.701%; +4.323%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.104ms; +302.554ms] or [+151.169%; +152.403%]
  • ignore throughput [+110.660op/s; +236.062op/s] or [+1.068%; +2.279%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.137%; +0.150%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.061ms; +297.864ms] or [+145.904%; +146.299%]
  • ignore throughput [+8.084op/s; +15.645op/s] or [+0.214%; +0.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.479ms; +299.916ms] or [+145.427%; +146.618%]
  • ignore throughput [-11.910op/s; +58.739op/s] or [-0.173%; +0.853%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.965ms; +303.485ms] or [+150.921%; +151.681%]
  • ignore throughput [+34.727op/s; +60.205op/s] or [+0.689%; +1.195%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+9.295µs; +13.711µs] or [+1.908%; +2.815%]
  • ignore throughput [-55.769op/s; -37.922op/s] or [-2.716%; -1.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+24.203µs; +51.137µs] or [+5.551%; +11.728%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-248.272op/s; -127.190op/s] or [-10.794%; -5.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+8.614µs; +30.546µs] or [+1.846%; +6.545%]
  • ignore throughput [-150.187op/s; -69.572op/s] or [-6.933%; -3.212%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3.503µs; +0.161µs] or [-0.946%; +0.044%]
  • ignore throughput [-0.831op/s; +25.535op/s] or [-0.031%; +0.946%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+23.497µs; +47.110µs] or [+7.502%; +15.040%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-437.433op/s; -238.751op/s] or [-13.636%; -7.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-9.396µs; +13.878µs] or [-2.570%; +3.796%]
  • ignore throughput [-132.421op/s; +6.339op/s] or [-4.752%; +0.227%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.581ms; +300.318ms] or [+149.521%; +149.890%]
  • ignore throughput [+3646301.018op/s; +4216977.484op/s] or [+1.826%; +2.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+99 bytes; +101 bytes] or [+0.554%; +0.565%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+409.560ms; +413.543ms] or [+445.004%; +449.332%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1173.553op/s; +1297.998op/s] or [+9.643%; +10.666%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+20 bytes; +22 bytes] or [+0.099%; +0.110%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+366.920ms; +370.112ms] or [+278.599%; +281.022%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+772.996op/s; +971.720op/s] or [+7.483%; +9.407%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2.784KB; +2.789KB] or [+4.946%; +4.954%]
  • unstable execution_time [+298.400ms; +385.541ms] or [+137.201%; +177.268%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-502.734op/s; -447.216op/s] or [-45.553%; -40.522%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.270KB; -1.268KB] or [-2.995%; -2.990%]
  • unstable execution_time [+203.978ms; +337.212ms] or [+86.927%; +143.705%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-742.907op/s; -659.485op/s] or [-49.552%; -43.988%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.304KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.441%; +5.449%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+342.189ms; +350.242ms] or [+204.668%; +209.486%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-418.345op/s; -382.995op/s] or [-29.129%; -26.667%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-50.243µs; -28.420µs] or [-2.528%; -1.430%]
  • ignore throughput [+7.676op/s; +13.456op/s] or [+1.525%; +2.674%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+34.788µs; +51.235µs] or [+2.390%; +3.520%]
  • ignore throughput [-22.911op/s; -15.596op/s] or [-3.335%; -2.270%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-108.307µs; -99.693µs] or [-3.768%; -3.468%]
  • ignore throughput [+12.523op/s; +13.635op/s] or [+3.600%; +3.919%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-8.823µs; -1.936µs] or [-0.762%; -0.167%]
  • ignore throughput [+1.620op/s; +6.750op/s] or [+0.188%; +0.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-57.267µs; -25.731µs] or [-5.311%; -2.386%]
  • ignore throughput [+26.341op/s; +61.263op/s] or [+2.840%; +6.605%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-63.465µs; +19.558µs] or [-3.400%; +1.048%]
  • ignore throughput [-3.461op/s; +42.894op/s] or [-0.646%; +8.006%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+18.955µs; +37.036µs] or [+0.740%; +1.447%]
  • ignore throughput [-5.456op/s; -2.759op/s] or [-1.397%; -0.706%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-132.927µs; -86.139µs] or [-6.734%; -4.363%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+25.669op/s; +37.716op/s] or [+5.067%; +7.446%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-305.831µs; -140.235µs] or [-7.756%; -3.556%]
  • ignore throughput [+10.549op/s; +32.077op/s] or [+4.160%; +12.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.915ms; +306.678ms] or [+153.549%; +154.437%]
  • ignore throughput [+832.246op/s; +3001.393op/s] or [+0.268%; +0.966%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.846ms; +303.890ms] or [+151.757%; +152.280%]
  • ignore throughput [+17299.338op/s; +21800.838op/s] or [+2.727%; +3.437%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.039ms; +304.508ms] or [+151.229%; +152.972%]
  • ignore throughput [+13713.987op/s; +21190.369op/s] or [+2.889%; +4.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.186ms; +302.356ms] or [+151.246%; +151.833%]
  • ignore throughput [-3086.167op/s; -1415.649op/s] or [-1.034%; -0.474%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.718ms; +301.311ms] or [+148.197%; +148.985%]
  • ignore throughput [-1592.472op/s; +2670.753op/s] or [-0.257%; +0.430%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.938ms; +308.465ms] or [+154.556%; +156.344%]
  • ignore throughput [+6462.847op/s; +14937.804op/s] or [+1.396%; +3.226%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.549ms; +304.473ms] or [+151.852%; +152.818%]
  • ignore throughput [-5998.668op/s; -3024.988op/s] or [-1.556%; -0.785%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.178ms; +301.193ms] or [+149.113%; +150.117%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+52423.074op/s; +56667.915op/s] or [+10.410%; +11.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.029ms; +302.756ms] or [+149.262%; +150.619%]
  • ignore throughput [-10651.305op/s; -4876.964op/s] or [-2.521%; -1.154%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.946ms; -1.188ms] or [-0.968%; -0.591%]
  • ignore throughput [+544.455op/s; +1537.599op/s] or [+0.219%; +0.618%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.165ms; -12.490ms] or [-7.517%; -5.808%]
  • ignore throughput [+15924.988op/s; +23763.727op/s] or [+4.369%; +6.519%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.725ms; +3.218ms] or [-0.364%; +1.614%]
  • ignore throughput [+11572.048op/s; +17225.627op/s] or [+4.224%; +6.288%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4.459KB; -4.431KB] or [-1.623%; -1.613%]
  • unstable execution_time [-75.311µs; +339.733µs] or [-18.602%; +83.917%]
  • ignore throughput [-276.895op/s; -53.616op/s] or [-11.143%; -2.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.921KB; -19.900KB] or [-7.267%; -7.259%]
  • unstable execution_time [-54.108µs; -2.451µs] or [-10.694%; -0.485%]
  • ignore throughput [+21.478op/s; +202.802op/s] or [+1.072%; +10.120%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-15.552KB; -15.536KB] or [-5.670%; -5.664%]
  • ignore execution_time [-60.291µs; -4.476µs] or [-10.448%; -0.776%]
  • ignore throughput [+26.436op/s; +178.737op/s] or [+1.510%; +10.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-165.329ns; +1275.996ns] or [-0.286%; +2.210%]
  • ignore throughput [-356.504op/s; +50.193op/s] or [-2.057%; +0.290%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • unstable execution_time [+6.904µs; +11.267µs] or [+16.318%; +26.632%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4931.102op/s; -3122.239op/s] or [-20.758%; -13.144%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-14.252µs; -7.042µs] or [-22.112%; -10.925%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1840.448op/s; +3361.685op/s] or [+11.292%; +20.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.061%; +0.072%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.767ms; +301.241ms] or [+151.519%; +152.264%]
  • ignore throughput [-159.221op/s; -134.348op/s] or [-2.660%; -2.245%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.151ms; +307.404ms] or [+154.812%; +156.468%]
  • ignore throughput [-170.170op/s; -88.377op/s] or [-2.110%; -1.096%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.027%; -0.017%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.338ms; +303.925ms] or [+150.356%; +152.152%]
  • ignore throughput [-289.354op/s; -216.572op/s] or [-3.686%; -2.759%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1334.867µs; -621.003µs] or [-0.665%; -0.310%]
  • ignore throughput [-16516.158op/s; -15158.309op/s] or [-4.572%; -4.196%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+297.059µs; +1089.951µs] or [+0.148%; +0.545%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+40599.248op/s; +44918.890op/s] or [+7.685%; +8.502%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.627ms; +5.297ms] or [+0.825%; +2.685%]
  • ignore throughput [+543.331op/s; +8834.921op/s] or [+0.129%; +2.091%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.389ms; +301.067ms] or [+149.219%; +150.055%]
  • ignore throughput [-470.082op/s; +854.886op/s] or [-0.310%; +0.564%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.670ms; +301.442ms] or [+150.982%; +151.370%]
  • ignore throughput [+6208.934op/s; +7379.795op/s] or [+2.700%; +3.209%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.829ms; +306.006ms] or [+154.083%; +155.186%]
  • ignore throughput [-451.395op/s; +1536.548op/s] or [-0.254%; +0.865%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.637ms; +300.398ms] or [+149.461%; +149.840%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+55683551.600op/s; +63496945.602op/s] or [+40.552%; +46.242%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+64 bytes; +66 bytes] or [+0.376%; +0.385%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+422.063ms; +426.147ms] or [+524.911%; +529.989%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+958.827op/s; +1128.273op/s] or [+7.412%; +8.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.239ms; +300.149ms] or [+149.253%; +149.708%]
  • ignore throughput [+1716686.852op/s; +2655110.648op/s] or [+0.760%; +1.176%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+106.189µs; +503.625µs] or [+0.053%; +0.252%]
  • ignore throughput [-15951.126op/s; +34.405op/s] or [-1.780%; +0.004%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.902ms; -3.776ms] or [-2.401%; -1.850%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90717.743op/s; +100144.543op/s] or [+8.470%; +9.350%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.650ms; +4.778ms] or [+0.329%; +2.418%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+53873.623op/s; +73075.170op/s] or [+6.236%; +8.458%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [+178.982µs; +644.239µs] or [+0.089%; +0.322%]
  • ignore throughput [-45521.316op/s; -24135.708op/s] or [-4.167%; -2.209%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.815ms; +10.182ms] or [+3.030%; +5.305%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+98954.675op/s; +129573.156op/s] or [+7.659%; +10.029%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.714ms; -3.261ms] or [-2.316%; -1.602%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90731.635op/s; +98870.582op/s] or [+9.011%; +9.819%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1207.428µs; +58.858µs] or [-0.601%; +0.029%]
  • ignore throughput [+2418.200op/s; +8856.503op/s] or [+0.539%; +1.973%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.750ms; -0.253ms] or [-0.874%; -0.126%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+45460.407op/s; +50677.128op/s] or [+8.255%; +9.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.694ms; +3.379ms] or [-0.349%; +1.698%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+24896.629op/s; +34408.864op/s] or [+5.573%; +7.702%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-407.477µs; +675.896µs] or [-0.203%; +0.337%]
  • ignore throughput [-32046.692op/s; -27759.357op/s] or [-4.690%; -4.063%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1444.573µs; +2081.414µs] or [-0.723%; +1.041%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+62230.846op/s; +80207.867op/s] or [+6.953%; +8.961%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.594ms; +5.496ms] or [+0.810%; +2.791%]
  • ignore throughput [+34659.501op/s; +49421.342op/s] or [+4.839%; +6.900%]

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8461) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.79 ± (72.96 - 73.46) ms72.93 ± (72.83 - 73.15) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration76.75 ± (76.64 - 77.01) ms79.53 ± (79.30 - 79.91) ms+3.6%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1072.91 ± (1072.04 - 1078.41) ms1072.08 ± (1071.29 - 1077.77) ms-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.65 ± (22.59 - 22.71) ms22.73 ± (22.67 - 22.80) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.92 ± (85.59 - 86.26) ms86.04 ± (85.71 - 86.36) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.42 ± (22.38 - 22.46) ms22.51 ± (22.45 - 22.56) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.54 ± (85.33 - 85.75) ms87.45 ± (87.14 - 87.76) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms230.89 ± (229.68 - 232.10) ms210.56 ± (209.58 - 211.54) ms-8.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms528.35 ± (526.80 - 529.89) ms523.57 ± (522.43 - 524.70) ms-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.54 ± (48.51 - 48.56) MB47.79 ± (47.75 - 47.82) MB-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.22 ± (21.17 - 21.27) ms21.45 ± (21.39 - 21.52) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.72 ± (73.46 - 73.98) ms75.01 ± (74.69 - 75.33) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.21 ± (21.16 - 21.25) ms21.09 ± (21.05 - 21.12) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.00 ± (74.78 - 75.23) ms74.67 ± (74.49 - 74.86) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB10.73 ± (10.72 - 10.73) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms383.31 ± (381.47 - 385.14) ms381.29 ± (378.99 - 383.60) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms528.77 ± (527.63 - 529.91) ms528.25 ± (527.04 - 529.45) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.88 ± (49.85 - 49.90) MB49.30 ± (49.28 - 49.33) MB-1.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.9%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.42 ± (19.38 - 19.45) ms19.53 ± (19.48 - 19.58) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.54 ± (72.38 - 72.71) ms73.80 ± (73.54 - 74.05) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB7.65 ± (7.64 - 7.65) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.63 ± (19.58 - 19.69) ms19.82 ± (19.76 - 19.87) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.08 ± (74.83 - 75.34) ms76.23 ± (75.98 - 76.48) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.72) MB7.70 ± (7.70 - 7.70) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms305.39 ± (303.09 - 307.68) ms303.37 ± (301.19 - 305.54) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms489.92 ± (488.77 - 491.07) ms487.27 ± (486.12 - 488.41) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.20 ± (37.16 - 37.23) MB36.64 ± (36.59 - 36.68) MB-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration190.88 ± (190.94 - 191.70) ms191.43 ± (191.19 - 191.93) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration194.62 ± (194.58 - 194.93) ms194.76 ± (194.64 - 195.11) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1147.54 ± (1149.71 - 1156.69) ms1146.29 ± (1146.73 - 1152.64) ms-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.07 ± (184.83 - 185.31) ms185.04 ± (184.72 - 185.36) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms80.72 ± (80.50 - 80.93) ms80.56 ± (80.37 - 80.74) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.12 ± (16.10 - 16.14) MB16.15 ± (16.12 - 16.18) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.54 ± (184.29 - 184.78) ms184.72 ± (184.47 - 184.97) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms81.73 ± (81.59 - 81.87) ms82.15 ± (82.00 - 82.29) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.18 ± (16.15 - 16.21) MB16.22 ± (16.19 - 16.25) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms393.76 ± (392.43 - 395.09) ms375.75 ± (374.56 - 376.95) ms-4.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms506.15 ± (504.88 - 507.42) ms508.10 ± (506.87 - 509.33) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed58.74 ± (58.54 - 58.94) MB56.62 ± (56.56 - 56.69) MB-3.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (29 - 30)-0.2%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms189.30 ± (188.99 - 189.62) ms189.72 ± (189.45 - 189.98) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.10 ± (69.95 - 70.26) ms70.48 ± (70.32 - 70.64) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.06 ± (15.91 - 16.21) MB16.10 ± (15.94 - 16.25) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.7%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms188.63 ± (188.41 - 188.86) ms189.38 ± (189.15 - 189.60) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.02 ± (70.93 - 71.11) ms71.48 ± (71.37 - 71.59) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.04 ± (15.88 - 16.21) MB16.19 ± (16.05 - 16.34) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.9%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms600.13 ± (597.64 - 602.61) ms587.03 ± (583.10 - 590.96) ms-2.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms508.40 ± (507.52 - 509.29) ms522.79 ± (521.19 - 524.39) ms+2.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.71 ± (61.62 - 61.80) MB60.69 ± (60.60 - 60.79) MB-1.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)31 ± (31 - 31)+1.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms186.80 ± (186.51 - 187.09) ms196.08 ± (195.15 - 197.02) ms+5.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.39 ± (69.23 - 69.55) ms72.50 ± (72.18 - 72.81) ms+4.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.77 ± (11.74 - 11.80) MB11.70 ± (11.68 - 11.72) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 19)+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms185.76 ± (185.61 - 185.91) ms188.42 ± (188.13 - 188.70) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.46 ± (70.41 - 70.52) ms71.41 ± (71.26 - 71.56) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.70 ± (11.62 - 11.78) MB11.84 ± (11.82 - 11.87) MB+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+3.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms518.13 ± (515.84 - 520.42) ms527.98 ± (522.98 - 532.97) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms466.87 ± (466.22 - 467.53) ms487.62 ± (486.32 - 488.92) ms+4.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.75 ± (50.72 - 50.78) MB50.34 ± (50.29 - 50.39) MB-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (73ms)  : 71, 75
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (80ms)  : 75, 84
    master - mean (77ms)  : 75, 79

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (1,075ms)  : 1027, 1122
    master - mean (1,075ms)  : 1030, 1121
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (116ms)  : 109, 124
    master - mean (116ms)  : 108, 123

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123
    master - mean (115ms)  : 111, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (772ms)  : 752, 793
    master - mean (797ms)  : 773, 821
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (103ms)  : 97, 109
    master - mean (102ms)  : 95, 108

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105
    master - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (936ms)  : 902, 970
    master - mean (940ms)  : 906, 974
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (101ms)  : 96, 106
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (104ms)  : 100, 108
    master - mean (103ms)  : 97, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (822ms)  : 786, 858
    master - mean (825ms)  : 786, 865
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (192ms)  : 188, 195
    master - mean (191ms)  : 188, 195

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (195ms)  : 193, 197
    master - mean (195ms)  : 193, 196

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (1,150ms)  : 1108, 1192
    master - mean (1,153ms)  : 1101, 1205
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (274ms)  : 270, 278
    master - mean (274ms)  : 270, 278

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (275ms)  : 273, 278
    master - mean (275ms)  : 271, 279

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (926ms)  : 902, 949
    master - mean (930ms)  : 903, 957
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (269ms)  : 265, 272
    master - mean (267ms)  : 263, 272

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (269ms)  : 266, 272
    master - mean (268ms)  : 265, 271

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (1,143ms)  : 1081, 1204
    master - mean (1,138ms)  : 1099, 1176
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8461) - mean (279ms)  : 257, 302
    master - mean (266ms)  : 261, 271

    section Bailout
    This PR (8461) - mean (270ms)  : 266, 274
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 268

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8461) - mean (1,050ms)  : 982, 1119
    master - mean (1,019ms)  : 981, 1057
Loading

@andrewlock andrewlock mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2026
Open
@andrewlock andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-vendors-3 branch from 7f66c52 to 3b42dd4 Compare April 16, 2026 13:16
@andrewlock andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners April 16, 2026 13:16
@andrewlock andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-vendors-4 branch from bdf65ae to ef58938 Compare April 16, 2026 13:16
This was referenced Apr 17, 2026
Open
Open
Open
Open
@andrewlock andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-vendors-3 branch from 3b42dd4 to 2e151f2 Compare April 21, 2026 10:19
@andrewlock andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-vendors-4 branch from ef58938 to 7dc44a2 Compare April 21, 2026 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dudikeleti dudikeleti dudikeleti approved these changes

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:vendors Code from other vendors type:cleanup Minor code clean up

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@andrewlock @dudikeleti @NachoEchevarria