Skip to content

Migrate remaining integration tests to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData - #8528

Open
bouwkast wants to merge 20 commits into
masterfrom
steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1
Open

Migrate remaining integration tests to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData#8528
bouwkast wants to merge 20 commits into
masterfrom
steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1

Conversation

@bouwkast

@bouwkast bouwkast commented Apr 27, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Migrates (what I think are) the remaining integration tests to use CombinatorialOrPairwiseData with the goal of speeding up PR CI runs with the hope of not missing regressions

Reason for change

As we have many tests our CI takes time running them, this aims to reduce some pressure as if a PR meets the criteria for running in Pairwise mode we will swap from combinatorial to pairwise for all of these integrations tests.

This will hopefully reduce times for runs that likely won't modify / impact these tests.

Implementation details

One commit per file with the following pattern(s):

  • Drop GetEnabledConfig() and the matching [MemberData(...)]
    • Replace with [CombinatorialOrPairwiseData]
  • Add Attributes : [PackageVersionData(nameof(PackageVersions.X))] and [MetadataSchemaVersionData]

Note that some tests needed a few more changes.

Test coverage

Less!

Same though on non-PR runs or on PR runs that end up on the thorough testing.

Other details

I have a planned follow up to reduce the V1 Schema tests that are run in general (the V0/V1 split causes most tests to be doubled for no real benefit as the move to the V1 schema has largely been replaced)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:tests unit tests, integration tests label Apr 27, 2026
@bouwkast

bouwkast commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 27, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-29 15:12:24

Comparing candidate commit 52c3887 in PR branch steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1 with baseline commit 2302d41 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 1 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+14897.515op/s; +18240.128op/s] or [+5.514%; +6.751%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5026.507op/s; -4799.368op/s] or [-5.738%; -5.479%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9520.339op/s; -8840.137op/s] or [-11.288%; -10.482%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-10692.145op/s; -9403.795op/s] or [-10.872%; -9.562%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.074ms; +305.186ms] or [+150.396%; +151.444%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-51.442op/s; -47.564op/s] or [-9.256%; -8.558%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+377.167ms; +380.113ms] or [+297.985%; +300.313%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+87.873op/s; +92.700op/s] or [+11.586%; +12.222%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+394.348ms; +396.055ms] or [+348.983%; +350.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.693KB; +4.694KB] or [+98.806%; +98.821%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60502.390op/s; -60049.507op/s] or [-47.074%; -46.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.827ms; -11.617ms] or [-7.392%; -5.426%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59400.237op/s; -56637.581op/s] or [-43.359%; -41.342%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48359.886op/s; -46095.696op/s] or [-43.723%; -41.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-268186.855op/s; -263794.172op/s] or [-27.383%; -26.935%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.066ms; -18.563ms] or [-11.624%; -8.278%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-79867.470op/s; -49836.008op/s] or [-8.532%; -5.324%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154254.419op/s; -138256.714op/s] or [-22.163%; -19.865%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72810.780op/s; -72031.640op/s] or [-49.001%; -48.476%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73196.066op/s; -70307.587op/s] or [-46.573%; -44.736%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56385.985op/s; -53763.365op/s] or [-44.919%; -42.830%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+314312.280op/s; +331936.383op/s] or [+10.481%; +11.068%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.093ms; -14.755ms] or [-8.801%; -6.802%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.623ms; +300.369ms] or [+149.712%; +150.084%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.195ms; +303.338ms] or [+151.389%; +152.974%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.652ms; +303.173ms] or [+150.941%; +152.715%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.842ms; +298.870ms] or [+146.288%; +146.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.913ms; +298.339ms] or [+144.661%; +145.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.952ms; +302.216ms] or [+149.916%; +151.047%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+28.415µs; +55.547µs] or [+6.517%; +12.740%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-268.050op/s; -146.184op/s] or [-11.654%; -6.356%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-196.031op/s; -110.138op/s] or [-9.049%; -5.084%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+30.058µs; +54.115µs] or [+9.596%; +17.276%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-492.684op/s; -290.803op/s] or [-15.358%; -9.065%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.348ms; +300.124ms] or [+149.406%; +149.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+416.280ms; +423.971ms] or [+452.305%; +460.662%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+726.472op/s; +880.799op/s] or [+5.970%; +7.238%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+246.203ms; +310.859ms] or [+186.939%; +236.032%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.861KB; +2.866KB] or [+5.082%; +5.091%]
  • unstable execution_time [+293.881ms; +343.835ms] or [+135.124%; +158.092%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-512.425op/s; -467.662op/s] or [-46.431%; -42.375%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+204.052ms; +337.333ms] or [+86.958%; +143.757%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-673.445op/s; -589.973op/s] or [-44.919%; -39.351%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+331.602ms; +345.210ms] or [+198.337%; +206.476%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-389.840op/s; -353.656op/s] or [-27.144%; -24.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-184.222µs; -127.711µs] or [-9.332%; -6.469%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+37.271op/s; +52.679op/s] or [+7.358%; +10.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.091ms; +304.335ms] or [+152.127%; +153.258%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.284ms; +303.545ms] or [+151.475%; +152.107%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.701ms; +304.984ms] or [+151.562%; +153.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.749ms; +304.509ms] or [+152.030%; +152.914%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.441ms; +302.553ms] or [+148.060%; +149.599%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.413ms; +306.108ms] or [+153.276%; +155.149%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.404ms; +302.952ms] or [+151.278%; +152.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.849ms; +305.476ms] or [+150.444%; +152.252%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+41004.004op/s; +49643.429op/s] or [+8.142%; +9.858%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.181ms; +303.090ms] or [+149.337%; +150.785%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+24.293µs; +70.322µs] or [+6.001%; +17.370%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-359.481op/s; -140.148op/s] or [-14.466%; -5.640%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.798KB; -26.775KB] or [-9.775%; -9.767%]
  • unstable execution_time [-32.673µs; +25.132µs] or [-6.458%; +4.967%]
  • unstable throughput [-88.592op/s; +115.111op/s] or [-4.421%; +5.744%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.009KB; -17.990KB] or [-6.565%; -6.558%]
  • unstable execution_time [-48.800µs; +15.679µs] or [-8.457%; +2.717%]
  • unstable throughput [-30.811op/s; +150.574op/s] or [-1.760%; +8.603%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+10.036µs; +16.183µs] or [+23.722%; +38.251%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6373.722op/s; -4292.861op/s] or [-26.831%; -18.072%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-11.416µs; -2.390µs] or [-17.711%; -3.708%]
  • unstable throughput [+609.234op/s; +2516.171op/s] or [+3.738%; +15.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.905ms; +304.249ms] or [+153.105%; +153.784%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.462ms; +306.482ms] or [+154.461%; +155.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.368ms; +301.915ms] or [+149.871%; +151.146%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+35966.971op/s; +44281.755op/s] or [+6.808%; +8.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.372ms; +302.368ms] or [+149.709%; +150.703%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.696ms; +304.183ms] or [+151.999%; +152.746%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.429ms; +305.901ms] or [+153.880%; +155.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.498ms; +301.361ms] or [+149.890%; +150.320%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61056329.796op/s; +61363887.728op/s] or [+44.465%; +44.689%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+417.658ms; +420.964ms] or [+519.433%; +523.544%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.211ms; +300.341ms] or [+149.239%; +149.803%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+89496.050op/s; +98689.544op/s] or [+8.356%; +9.214%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+73848.605op/s; +107485.594op/s] or [+5.716%; +8.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+70272.990op/s; +78628.876op/s] or [+6.979%; +7.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+44527.509op/s; +50380.139op/s] or [+8.085%; +9.148%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+80913.387op/s; +100316.061op/s] or [+9.040%; +11.208%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 27, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8528) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.68 ± (71.73 - 72.16) ms73.44 ± (73.21 - 73.69) ms+2.5%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration78.42 ± (78.10 - 78.59) ms75.23 ± (74.92 - 75.33) ms-4.1%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1087.49 ± (1086.77 - 1093.07) ms1083.35 ± (1085.16 - 1092.86) ms-0.4%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.38 ± (22.34 - 22.42) ms22.13 ± (22.09 - 22.17) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.10 ± (83.85 - 84.36) ms82.95 ± (82.64 - 83.26) ms-1.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.98 ± (10.98 - 10.99) MB11.02 ± (11.02 - 11.02) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.04 ± (22.02 - 22.07) ms21.91 ± (21.87 - 21.94) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms83.68 ± (83.47 - 83.88) ms82.24 ± (82.10 - 82.38) ms-1.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.03 ± (11.03 - 11.03) MB11.07 ± (11.06 - 11.07) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms209.92 ± (209.02 - 210.82) ms210.14 ± (209.27 - 211.01) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms538.02 ± (536.78 - 539.25) ms537.76 ± (536.37 - 539.15) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.53 ± (49.50 - 49.56) MB49.56 ± (49.52 - 49.60) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.81 ± (20.78 - 20.84) ms20.83 ± (20.80 - 20.86) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.63 ± (71.46 - 71.80) ms71.24 ± (71.09 - 71.39) ms-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.71 ± (10.71 - 10.71) MB10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.77 ± (20.74 - 20.80) ms20.66 ± (20.64 - 20.69) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.61 ± (72.48 - 72.74) ms71.87 ± (71.73 - 72.00) ms-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.83 ± (10.83 - 10.84) MB10.83 ± (10.83 - 10.84) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms372.11 ± (369.95 - 374.27) ms367.85 ± (365.45 - 370.26) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms547.53 ± (546.34 - 548.72) ms544.30 ± (543.17 - 545.43) ms-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.64 ± (50.62 - 50.66) MB50.67 ± (50.64 - 50.69) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.47 ± (19.42 - 19.52) ms19.32 ± (19.27 - 19.36) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.39 ± (73.14 - 73.63) ms72.73 ± (72.44 - 73.01) ms-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.75 ± (7.74 - 7.75) MB7.76 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.18 ± (19.14 - 19.21) ms19.13 ± (19.09 - 19.16) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.38 ± (72.19 - 72.57) ms72.65 ± (72.44 - 72.86) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.80 ± (7.80 - 7.80) MB7.83 ± (7.82 - 7.84) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms294.06 ± (292.12 - 296.01) ms298.14 ± (295.96 - 300.32) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms503.80 ± (502.44 - 505.15) ms492.84 ± (491.94 - 493.74) ms-2.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.01 ± (37.99 - 38.04) MB38.07 ± (38.04 - 38.09) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.0%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration204.99 ± (204.93 - 205.88) ms215.61 ± (215.48 - 216.63) ms+5.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration209.74 ± (209.44 - 210.44) ms221.02 ± (220.57 - 221.60) ms+5.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1238.61 ± (1237.15 - 1243.33) ms1300.01 ± (1299.55 - 1305.80) ms+5.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms196.67 ± (196.24 - 197.10) ms208.03 ± (207.56 - 208.50) ms+5.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.31 ± (86.02 - 86.60) ms92.98 ± (92.68 - 93.28) ms+7.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.15 ± (16.12 - 16.18) MB16.11 ± (16.09 - 16.13) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+1.9%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.83 ± (196.36 - 197.29) ms207.14 ± (206.68 - 207.60) ms+5.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms87.47 ± (87.24 - 87.70) ms94.10 ± (93.80 - 94.40) ms+7.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.15 ± (16.12 - 16.17) MB16.14 ± (16.12 - 16.16) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+1.7%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms390.74 ± (389.32 - 392.16) ms407.19 ± (405.72 - 408.65) ms+4.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms551.71 ± (550.51 - 552.92) ms579.16 ± (577.71 - 580.62) ms+5.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed58.97 ± (58.75 - 59.19) MB59.81 ± (59.73 - 59.88) MB+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+1.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms203.15 ± (202.78 - 203.52) ms213.69 ± (213.17 - 214.20) ms+5.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.14 ± (75.92 - 76.36) ms81.82 ± (81.56 - 82.08) ms+7.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.55 ± (16.52 - 16.57) MB16.37 ± (16.36 - 16.39) MB-1.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)20 ± (19 - 20)+1.8%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms203.41 ± (203.07 - 203.76) ms213.89 ± (213.42 - 214.37) ms+5.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms78.01 ± (77.83 - 78.19) ms83.36 ± (83.04 - 83.68) ms+6.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.53 ± (16.51 - 16.54) MB16.36 ± (16.35 - 16.38) MB-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)21 ± (20 - 21)+1.7%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms584.38 ± (582.15 - 586.61) ms579.55 ± (577.38 - 581.72) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms562.58 ± (561.31 - 563.85) ms593.19 ± (592.03 - 594.35) ms+5.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.61 ± (61.52 - 61.70) MB61.77 ± (61.68 - 61.86) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms200.95 ± (200.57 - 201.33) ms213.67 ± (213.14 - 214.21) ms+6.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.52 ± (74.22 - 74.82) ms80.87 ± (80.65 - 81.10) ms+8.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.84 ± (11.81 - 11.86) MB11.77 ± (11.75 - 11.78) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+2.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms201.31 ± (200.89 - 201.72) ms213.43 ± (212.93 - 213.94) ms+6.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.04 ± (75.85 - 76.23) ms82.48 ± (82.17 - 82.78) ms+8.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.85 ± (11.82 - 11.87) MB11.78 ± (11.76 - 11.80) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+1.7%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms511.03 ± (505.70 - 516.35) ms530.01 ± (523.02 - 537.00) ms+3.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms514.59 ± (513.52 - 515.67) ms547.29 ± (546.27 - 548.30) ms+6.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.34 ± (51.28 - 51.40) MB51.63 ± (51.55 - 51.71) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+1.1%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (73ms)  : 70, 77
    master - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (75ms)  : 72, 78
    master - mean (78ms)  : 75, 82

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (1,089ms)  : 1034, 1144
    master - mean (1,090ms)  : 1044, 1135
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (111ms)  : 104, 118
    master - mean (114ms)  : 108, 120

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (110ms)  : 108, 112
    master - mean (113ms)  : 108, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (785ms)  : 764, 806
    master - mean (786ms)  : 766, 805
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (98ms)  : 95, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (98ms)  : 96, 100
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (940ms)  : 904, 977
    master - mean (949ms)  : 915, 982
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (99ms)  : 93, 106
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (99ms)  : 94, 105
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (819ms)  : 784, 854
    master - mean (830ms)  : 787, 872
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (216ms)  : 209, 223
    master - mean (205ms)  : 200, 211

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (221ms)  : 216, 226
    master - mean (210ms)  : 205, 215

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (1,303ms)  : 1258, 1347
    master - mean (1,240ms)  : 1194, 1286
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (313ms)  : 303, 322
    master - mean (293ms)  : 285, 301

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (312ms)  : crit, 304, 320
    master - mean (294ms)  : 288, 301

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (1,028ms)  : 1010, 1047
    master - mean (984ms)  : 958, 1010
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (306ms)  : 296, 316
    master - mean (289ms)  : 284, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (308ms)  : crit, 298, 317
    master - mean (291ms)  : 287, 296

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (1,215ms)  : 1175, 1255
    master - mean (1,180ms)  : 1144, 1216
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8528) - mean (306ms)  : 294, 317
    master - mean (286ms)  : 280, 291

    section Bailout
    This PR (8528) - mean (307ms)  : crit, 299, 316
    master - mean (288ms)  : 283, 293

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8528) - mean (1,127ms)  : 1021, 1232
    master - mean (1,062ms)  : 989, 1135
Loading

@bouwkast
bouwkast marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2026 16:21
@bouwkast
bouwkast requested review from a team as code owners April 29, 2026 16:21
@bouwkast bouwkast added the AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos label Apr 29, 2026
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1 branch from 04125b8 to 17e53b9 Compare May 14, 2026 13:17
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1 branch from 17e53b9 to 68e0763 Compare June 11, 2026 11:40
bouwkast added 18 commits July 29, 2026 10:19
@bouwkast
test(aerospike): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
ef46df1
@bouwkast
test(cosmos): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
43fc712
@bouwkast
test(cosmos-vnext): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
e89a603
@bouwkast
test(couchbase): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
6da8b01
@bouwkast
test(couchbase3): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
c2b026d
@bouwkast
test(elasticsearch5): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
c3914d5
@bouwkast
test(elasticsearch6): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
9142482
@bouwkast
test(elasticsearch7): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
ef5261e
@bouwkast
test(kafka): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
fb98a43
@bouwkast
test(rabbitmq): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
fd857e9
@bouwkast
test(stackexchange-redis): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
5994100
@bouwkast
test(servicestack-redis): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
e0eeaa2
@bouwkast
test(azure-service-bus): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
ab29933
@bouwkast
test(azure-service-bus-apm): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
2f3a3f0
@bouwkast
test(azure-event-hubs): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
200a935
@bouwkast
test(oracle): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
b355796
@bouwkast
test(mongodb): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
f25d3e1
@bouwkast
test(google-protobuf): migrate to CombinatorialOrPairwiseData
d319bb6
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/combinatorial-and-pairwise-migration-phase-1 branch from 68e0763 to 52c3887 Compare July 29, 2026 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos area:tests unit tests, integration tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@bouwkast