Skip to content

[Serverless] Bump Datadog.Serverless.Compat to 1.5.0#8602

Merged
Lewis-E merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
lewis/SVLS-8244/update-compat-version
May 12, 2026
Merged

[Serverless] Bump Datadog.Serverless.Compat to 1.5.0#8602
Lewis-E merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
lewis/SVLS-8244/update-compat-version

Conversation

@Lewis-E

@Lewis-E Lewis-E commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps the Datadog.Serverless.Compat PackageReference in tracer/src/Datadog.AzureFunctions/Datadog.AzureFunctions.csproj from 1.4.01.5.0.
  • 1.5.0 ships multifunction named-pipe coordination for .NET on Azure Functions Premium plans. It bundles the datadog-serverless-compat/v0.24.0 binary, which contains the dual TCP+pipe listener (serverless-components#94) and best-effort TCP-8126 bind (serverless-components#129) — both required to land the named-pipe path merged in #8164.

Test plan

  • CI green (csproj-only change; should be a no-op outside of Datadog.AzureFunctions packaging)
  • Confirm a built Datadog.AzureFunctions package resolves Datadog.Serverless.Compat 1.5.0 from NuGet at restore time

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Picks up multifunction named-pipe coordination shipped in
datadog-serverless-compat-dotnet 1.5.0, which bundles
serverless-components datadog-serverless-compat/v0.24.0
(dual TCP+pipe listener + best-effort TCP bind).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-11 18:14:54

Comparing candidate commit 49cee6b in PR branch lewis/SVLS-8244/update-compat-version with baseline commit 0f0a34a in branch master.

Some scenarios are present only in baseline or only in candidate runs. If you didn't create or remove some scenarios in your branch, this maybe a sign of crashed benchmarks 💥💥💥
Check Gitlab CI job log to find if any benchmark has crashed.

Scenarios present only in baseline:

  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

Found 4 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 51 metrics, 16 unstable metrics, 90 known flaky benchmarks, 36 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-74937.848op/s; -68361.277op/s] or [-50.907%; -46.439%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-30.829ms; -16.170ms] or [-15.299%; -8.024%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-98.625ms; -96.539ms] or [-49.253%; -48.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-94.951ms; -92.268ms] or [-48.323%; -46.957%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-26.035ms; +20.372ms] or [-15.715%; +12.296%]
  • unstable throughput [-17500.534op/s; +19022.607op/s] or [-11.150%; +12.119%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+1.506ms; +40.216ms] or [+1.329%; +35.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-57.110ms; -24.371ms] or [-34.549%; -14.744%]
  • unstable throughput [+17093.305op/s; +38957.018op/s] or [+12.557%; +28.618%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-33.695ms; -9.109ms] or [-30.620%; -8.278%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-46.620ms; -27.268ms] or [-29.227%; -17.095%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-22.289ms; -8.877ms] or [-14.786%; -5.889%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+9260.364op/s; +18594.513op/s] or [+7.153%; +14.362%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-27.172ms; +10.831ms] or [-18.321%; +7.303%]
  • unstable throughput [-16710.127op/s; +13392.551op/s] or [-9.295%; +7.449%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+9.849ms; +34.587ms] or [+10.975%; +38.543%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-38.522ms; -15.948ms] or [-25.099%; -10.391%]
  • unstable throughput [+13207.756op/s; +35692.895op/s] or [+7.958%; +21.505%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-57.632ms; -27.250ms] or [-43.370%; -20.507%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-21.514ms; +6.241ms] or [-14.390%; +4.174%]
  • unstable throughput [+11934.051op/s; +31921.073op/s] or [+7.616%; +20.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+28.656ms; +57.871ms] or [+31.142%; +62.893%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+8.332%; +8.340%]
  • unstable execution_time [-39.652ms; -5.013ms] or [-26.499%; -3.350%]
  • unstable throughput [-2488.145op/s; +17240.089op/s] or [-1.750%; +12.124%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.800ms; +19.695ms] or [-14.383%; +17.929%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-0.624ms; +38.869ms] or [-0.411%; +25.597%]
  • unstable throughput [-24117.383op/s; +4251.733op/s] or [-15.654%; +2.760%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-57.314ms; -26.827ms] or [-43.670%; -20.441%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-38.668ms; -7.697ms] or [-24.549%; -4.887%]
  • unstable throughput [+7295.094op/s; +30642.401op/s] or [+7.696%; +32.327%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-34.815ms; -9.502ms] or [-31.678%; -8.646%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+33.132ms; +67.044ms] or [+21.627%; +43.764%]
  • unstable throughput [-33672.537op/s; -16536.245op/s] or [-28.067%; -13.783%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-34.443ms; -9.834ms] or [-30.551%; -8.723%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-27.866ms; -1.477ms] or [-18.055%; -0.957%]
  • unstable throughput [-10163.325op/s; +8000.842op/s] or [-6.872%; +5.410%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-33.615ms; -7.495ms] or [-31.145%; -6.944%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-43.444ms; -20.803ms] or [-28.628%; -13.708%]
  • unstable throughput [+2107.940op/s; +21332.128op/s] or [+1.213%; +12.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+7.945ms; +32.719ms] or [+8.768%; +36.109%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-10081.511op/s; -8880.346op/s] or [-11.954%; -10.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-59.699ms; -41.750ms] or [-29.784%; -20.829%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49694.287op/s; -39111.100op/s] or [-41.770%; -32.874%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-84.055ms; -61.515ms] or [-42.277%; -30.940%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-11877.827op/s; -8445.486op/s] or [-12.077%; -8.587%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+321.757ms; +337.175ms] or [+159.667%; +167.318%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-54.901op/s; -42.262op/s] or [-9.878%; -7.604%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+108.828ms; +129.952ms] or [+85.981%; +102.670%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+83.496ms; +84.460ms] or [+73.891%; +74.744%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+9.299%; +9.310%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-38053.412op/s; -25543.014op/s] or [-27.777%; -18.645%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-61.162ms; -40.877ms] or [-29.125%; -19.465%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-257863.909op/s; -253192.200op/s] or [-26.329%; -25.852%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+35.945%; +35.954%]
  • unstable execution_time [-100.195ms; -70.293ms] or [-44.683%; -31.348%]
  • unstable throughput [-188034.984op/s; -77283.212op/s] or [-20.088%; -8.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • unstable execution_time [-64.452ms; -39.372ms] or [-32.172%; -19.653%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-124544.356op/s; -107989.987op/s] or [-17.895%; -15.516%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-40087.057op/s; -27474.663op/s] or [-25.507%; -17.482%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-49.167ms; -28.750ms] or [-25.067%; -14.658%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+11067.417op/s; +13732.510op/s] or [+8.817%; +10.940%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-40.005ms; -17.763ms] or [-19.779%; -8.782%]
  • unstable throughput [-546055.447op/s; -180455.256op/s] or [-18.208%; -6.017%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-47.336ms; -26.451ms] or [-21.820%; -12.193%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+196478.061op/s; +253744.454op/s] or [+7.799%; +10.072%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.785ms; +315.626ms] or [+150.791%; +157.708%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+148.542ms; +187.021ms] or [+74.910%; +94.315%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+217.605ms; +262.720ms] or [+109.613%; +132.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.522ms; +312.033ms] or [+146.622%; +153.258%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+251.804ms; +271.564ms] or [+123.098%; +132.758%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.031ms; +308.483ms] or [+150.955%; +154.179%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+21.653µs; +45.260µs] or [+6.913%; +14.449%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-422.504op/s; -223.837op/s] or [-13.171%; -6.978%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.564ms; +301.967ms] or [+150.012%; +150.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+369.076ms; +392.076ms] or [+401.017%; +426.006%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7050.063op/s; -6823.187op/s] or [-57.931%; -56.067%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+201.769ms; +262.457ms] or [+153.201%; +199.281%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-1291.579op/s; -1044.872op/s] or [-12.503%; -10.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.614ms; +318.913ms] or [+138.679%; +146.633%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-686.884op/s; -668.924op/s] or [-62.238%; -60.611%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-56.629ms; +76.996ms] or [-24.133%; +32.813%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-689.904op/s; -600.637op/s] or [-46.017%; -40.063%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+337.513ms; +345.770ms] or [+201.872%; +206.810%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-723.436op/s; -689.310op/s] or [-50.372%; -47.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-163.176µs; -153.680µs] or [-5.677%; -5.346%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19.673op/s; +20.937op/s] or [+5.655%; +6.018%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-203.873µs; -188.957µs] or [-10.327%; -9.572%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+53.758op/s; +58.424op/s] or [+10.612%; +11.533%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-220.021µs; -198.111µs] or [-5.580%; -5.024%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+13.442op/s; +15.010op/s] or [+5.301%; +5.919%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.624ms; +321.398ms] or [+154.410%; +161.850%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+259.308ms; +279.443ms] or [+129.940%; +140.029%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.218ms; +309.072ms] or [+152.324%; +155.265%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.715ms; +318.408ms] or [+153.520%; +159.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+213.442ms; +239.356ms] or [+105.538%; +118.351%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.546ms; +308.557ms] or [+152.837%; +156.390%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.279ms; +316.055ms] or [+152.219%; +158.631%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+207.949ms; +279.170ms] or [+103.643%; +139.141%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+35006.621op/s; +48158.629op/s] or [+6.951%; +9.563%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.607ms; +308.103ms] or [+150.047%; +153.279%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-71.842ms; -43.498ms] or [-33.407%; -20.227%]
  • unstable throughput [-131471.652op/s; -82564.452op/s] or [-36.066%; -22.650%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-72.421ms; -43.667ms] or [-36.327%; -21.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.502KB; -26.480KB] or [-9.667%; -9.659%]
  • unstable execution_time [-20.593µs; +77.231µs] or [-4.070%; +15.264%]
  • unstable throughput [-155.416op/s; +140.797op/s] or [-7.755%; +7.026%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+43.589KB; +43.611KB] or [+15.890%; +15.898%]
  • unstable execution_time [+156.939µs; +399.168µs] or [+27.196%; +69.173%]
  • unstable throughput [-464.769op/s; -95.657op/s] or [-26.553%; -5.465%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+3.046µs; +8.309µs] or [+7.199%; +19.640%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-3609.649op/s; -1531.844op/s] or [-15.195%; -6.449%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.688µs; -4.350µs] or [-21.236%; -6.750%]
  • unstable throughput [+1327.055op/s; +3312.319op/s] or [+8.142%; +20.322%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.651ms; +318.844ms] or [+153.987%; +161.162%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.284ms; +309.305ms] or [+154.370%; +157.435%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.344ms; +309.685ms] or [+151.861%; +155.036%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-68.802ms; -26.039ms] or [-34.390%; -13.016%]
  • unstable throughput [-191436.907op/s; -112216.045op/s] or [-36.235%; -21.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-79.059ms; -47.671ms] or [-40.075%; -24.164%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.745ms; +315.463ms] or [+149.894%; +157.230%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+232.299ms; +288.876ms] or [+116.650%; +145.060%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.078ms; +310.404ms] or [+154.209%; +157.417%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.206ms; +300.989ms] or [+149.744%; +150.135%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+59911518.989op/s; +60235624.575op/s] or [+43.631%; +43.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+364.357ms; +376.379ms] or [+453.143%; +468.094%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7350.893op/s; -7144.680op/s] or [-56.826%; -55.232%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.815ms; +306.977ms] or [+151.536%; +153.113%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-30350306.096op/s; -28973113.707op/s] or [-13.443%; -12.833%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-91.936ms; -67.514ms] or [-45.029%; -33.067%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+70596.548op/s; +89066.792op/s] or [+6.591%; +8.316%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-88.564ms; -65.937ms] or [-44.814%; -33.364%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-90.853ms; -86.401ms] or [-47.335%; -45.016%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+69014.593op/s; +104605.714op/s] or [+5.342%; +8.097%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-94.873ms; -72.218ms] or [-46.613%; -35.482%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+67363.295op/s; +79362.825op/s] or [+6.690%; +7.882%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-87.166ms; -64.163ms] or [-43.530%; -32.043%]
  • unstable throughput [-46331.888op/s; +17971.097op/s] or [-8.413%; +3.263%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-97.310ms; -93.164ms] or [-48.892%; -46.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-80.340ms; -51.075ms] or [-40.184%; -25.547%]
  • unstable throughput [-212813.935op/s; -76287.653op/s] or [-23.777%; -8.523%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-31.283ms; -7.903ms] or [-15.888%; -4.014%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

@Lewis-E Lewis-E marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2026 18:48
@Lewis-E Lewis-E requested review from a team as code owners May 11, 2026 18:48
@Lewis-E Lewis-E requested a review from Chronobreak May 11, 2026 18:48
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8602) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.21 ± (73.32 - 73.81) ms72.46 ± (72.49 - 72.84) ms-1.0%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.18 ± (79.33 - 79.89) ms77.33 ± (77.12 - 77.54) ms-2.3%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1089.12 ± (1089.13 - 1096.41) ms1097.78 ± (1096.07 - 1102.32) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.88 ± (22.81 - 22.95) ms22.58 ± (22.53 - 22.62) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms88.10 ± (87.77 - 88.43) ms85.37 ± (85.18 - 85.56) ms-3.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.93) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.50 ± (22.46 - 22.55) ms22.79 ± (22.74 - 22.85) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms87.53 ± (87.24 - 87.83) ms88.36 ± (88.05 - 88.68) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.90) MB10.96 ± (10.96 - 10.96) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms212.81 ± (211.81 - 213.81) ms212.47 ± (211.56 - 213.37) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms538.64 ± (537.22 - 540.06) ms539.30 ± (537.91 - 540.68) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.08 ± (48.05 - 48.10) MB48.05 ± (48.02 - 48.09) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.14 ± (21.10 - 21.18) ms21.76 ± (21.70 - 21.83) ms+3.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.69 ± (73.52 - 73.87) ms76.90 ± (76.59 - 77.21) ms+4.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.32 ± (21.26 - 21.38) ms21.33 ± (21.28 - 21.37) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.45 ± (76.16 - 76.74) ms76.27 ± (76.07 - 76.46) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms377.07 ± (375.02 - 379.11) ms381.29 ± (379.46 - 383.12) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms540.69 ± (539.37 - 542.02) ms543.32 ± (541.81 - 544.83) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.44 ± (49.42 - 49.47) MB49.58 ± (49.56 - 49.61) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.51 ± (19.47 - 19.56) ms19.65 ± (19.61 - 19.68) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.48 ± (73.25 - 73.72) ms74.13 ± (73.93 - 74.32) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.66 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.43 ± (19.39 - 19.47) ms19.93 ± (19.88 - 19.99) ms+2.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.98 ± (73.81 - 74.16) ms77.22 ± (76.96 - 77.48) ms+4.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms295.37 ± (293.01 - 297.72) ms296.66 ± (294.39 - 298.93) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms496.99 ± (495.68 - 498.30) ms497.08 ± (495.93 - 498.22) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.65 ± (36.62 - 36.67) MB36.61 ± (36.59 - 36.64) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration189.81 ± (189.68 - 190.23) ms190.14 ± (190.16 - 190.88) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration193.55 ± (193.45 - 193.81) ms193.45 ± (193.37 - 193.73) ms-0.0%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1158.35 ± (1158.32 - 1164.12) ms1156.63 ± (1158.53 - 1164.44) ms-0.1%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms184.06 ± (183.78 - 184.35) ms183.95 ± (183.66 - 184.24) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms79.79 ± (79.61 - 79.96) ms80.04 ± (79.85 - 80.23) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.13) MB16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.14) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+1.3%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms183.26 ± (183.02 - 183.51) ms183.40 ± (183.18 - 183.63) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.93 ± (80.83 - 81.04) ms81.12 ± (81.02 - 81.21) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.00 ± (15.89 - 16.11) MB15.82 ± (15.68 - 15.97) MB-1.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-1.1%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms373.95 ± (372.81 - 375.10) ms375.41 ± (374.08 - 376.73) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms513.30 ± (512.25 - 514.35) ms515.52 ± (514.29 - 516.75) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed56.92 ± (56.87 - 56.98) MB56.92 ± (56.86 - 56.98) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.2%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms188.36 ± (188.12 - 188.60) ms188.43 ± (188.19 - 188.68) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.65 ± (69.51 - 69.79) ms69.64 ± (69.51 - 69.78) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.94 ± (15.76 - 16.12) MB16.08 ± (15.93 - 16.23) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (17 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+2.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms188.02 ± (187.83 - 188.21) ms187.70 ± (187.50 - 187.91) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms70.46 ± (70.39 - 70.53) ms70.41 ± (70.32 - 70.49) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.44 ± (15.26 - 15.61) MB15.92 ± (15.74 - 16.10) MB+3.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+2.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms578.39 ± (573.46 - 583.33) ms574.12 ± (568.59 - 579.65) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms510.18 ± (509.40 - 510.96) ms510.87 ± (510.09 - 511.65) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed60.71 ± (60.63 - 60.79) MB60.74 ± (60.65 - 60.83) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.15 ± (184.93 - 185.36) ms186.00 ± (185.75 - 186.25) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms68.82 ± (68.67 - 68.97) ms68.78 ± (68.64 - 68.93) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.43 ± (11.31 - 11.55) MB11.73 ± (11.67 - 11.79) MB+2.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count17 ± (17 - 17)18 ± (17 - 18)+2.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.74 ± (184.59 - 184.89) ms184.93 ± (184.75 - 185.10) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.73 ± (69.67 - 69.79) ms69.64 ± (69.58 - 69.71) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.69 ± (11.60 - 11.79) MB11.61 ± (11.50 - 11.73) MB-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 19)-0.8%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms512.93 ± (510.46 - 515.41) ms512.61 ± (509.98 - 515.24) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms469.93 ± (469.20 - 470.66) ms470.56 ± (469.83 - 471.28) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.41 ± (50.38 - 50.44) MB50.39 ± (50.36 - 50.42) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 29)29 ± (29 - 29)-0.1%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (73ms)  : 70, 75
    master - mean (74ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (77ms)  : 74, 80
    master - mean (80ms)  : 76, 84

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (1,099ms)  : 1054, 1145
    master - mean (1,093ms)  : 1040, 1146

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (115ms)  : 112, 119
    master - mean (118ms)  : 112, 124

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (119ms)  : 112, 125
    master - mean (117ms)  : 112, 123

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (789ms)  : 767, 811
    master - mean (791ms)  : 767, 814

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (105ms)  : 99, 112
    master - mean (101ms)  : 98, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (104ms)  : 101, 108
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (950ms)  : 915, 985
    master - mean (945ms)  : 905, 985

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (102ms)  : 98, 106
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (105ms)  : 100, 110
    master - mean (101ms)  : 99, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (825ms)  : 782, 868
    master - mean (823ms)  : 781, 866

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (191ms)  : 187, 194
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (194ms)  : 192, 195
    master - mean (194ms)  : 192, 195

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (1,161ms)  : 1119, 1204
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1119, 1203

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276
    master - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (273ms)  : 270, 276
    master - mean (272ms)  : 269, 275

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (931ms)  : 908, 955
    master - mean (925ms)  : 909, 942

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (266ms)  : 262, 270
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 270

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (1,111ms)  : 1023, 1199
    master - mean (1,117ms)  : 1047, 1186

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8602) - mean (264ms)  : 260, 269
    master - mean (263ms)  : 260, 267

    section Bailout
    This PR (8602) - mean (264ms)  : 262, 266
    master - mean (264ms)  : 262, 266

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8602) - mean (1,014ms)  : 971, 1056
    master - mean (1,014ms)  : 976, 1052

Loading

@Lewis-E Lewis-E merged commit 7ad43ab into master May 12, 2026
139 checks passed
@Lewis-E Lewis-E deleted the lewis/SVLS-8244/update-compat-version branch May 12, 2026 14:07
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants